Willingness to Compete in Dirty Competitions

References

• Abbink K, Sadrieh A (2009) The pleasure of being nasty. Econom. Lett. 105(3):306–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sanchez A (2014) Do beliefs justify actions or do actions justify beliefs? An experiment on stated beliefs, revealed beliefs, and social-image manipulation. NBER Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Oosterbeek H (2023) The anatomy of competitiveness. Working Paper, IZA – Institute of Labor Economics IZA DP No. 16224.Google Scholar
• Buser T, Cappelen AW, Tungodden B (2025) Fairness and willingness to compete. Experiment. Econom. 28(4):1022–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2026) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Rev. Econom. Statist. 108(3):755–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Peter N, Wolter SC (2017) Gender, competitiveness, and study choices in high school: Evidence from Switzerland. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):125–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Peter N, Wolter SC (2022) Willingness to compete, gender and career choices along the whole ability distribution. Experiment. Econom. 25(5):1299–1326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, van den Assem M, van Dolder D (2023) Gender and willingness to compete for high stakes. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 206:350–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Li J, Niu X (2022) White lies in tournaments. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 96:101791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) When do we lie? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright E, Menezes MLC (2014) Cheating to win: Dishonesty and the intensity of competition. Econom. Lett. 122(1):55–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen K-P (2003) Sabotage in promotion tournaments. J. Law Econom. Organ. 19(1):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dariel A, Kephart C, Nikiforakis N, Zenker C (2017) Emirati women do not shy away from competition: Evidence from a patriarchal society in transition. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 3(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dato S, Nieken P (2014) Gender differences in competition and sabotage. J. Econom. Behav Organ. 100:64–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dato S, Nieken P (2020) Gender differences in sabotage: The role of uncertainty and beliefs. Experiment. Econom. 23(2):353–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Tella R, Perez-Truglia R, Babino A, Sigman M (2015) Conveniently upset: Avoiding altruism by distorting beliefs about others’ altruism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(11):3416–3442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J. Personality Assess. 49(1):71–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Johannesson M (2008) Gender differences in deception. Econom. Lett. 99(1):197–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Huffman D, Sunde U (2023) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Management Sci. 69(4):1935–1950.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gërxhani K, Brandts J, Schram A (2023) Competition and gender in-equality: A comprehensive analysis of effects and mechanisms. Amer. J. Sociol. 129(3):715–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosch K, Rau HA (2017) Gender differences in honesty: The role of social value orientation. J. Econom. Psych. 62:258–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Sci. 57(4):611–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Houser D, List JA, Piovesan M, Samek A, Winter J (2016) Dishonesty: From parents to children. Eur. Econom. Rev. 82:242–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonason PK, Webster GD (2010) The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psych. Assess. 22(2):420–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kajackaite A, Gneezy U (2017) Incentives and cheating. Games Econom. Behav. 102:433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy JA, Kray LJ (2022) Gender similarities and differences in dishonesty. Curr. Opin. Psych. 48:101461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang FR, John D, Lüdtke O, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behav. Res. Methods 43(2):548–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lozano L, Ranehill E, Reuben E (2022) Gender and preferences in the labor market: Insights from experiments. Zimmermann KF, ed. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland) 1–34.Google Scholar
• Markowsky E, Beblo M (2022) When do we observe a gender gap in competition entry? A meta-analysis of the experimental literature. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 198:139–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller J, Schwieren C, Spitzer F (2022) How to prevent destruction–On the malleability of anti-social behavior. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 97:101798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nieken P, Dato S (2016) Compensation and honesty: Gender differences in lying. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2024) Overconfidence and preferences for competition. J. Finance 79(2):1087–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW (1994) Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(6):1063–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwieren C, Weichselbaumer D (2010) Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 31(3):241–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M (2009) Deception through telling the truth?! Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. Econom. J. 119(534):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward DA, Beck WL (1990) Gender and dishonesty. J. Soc. Psych. 130(3):333–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ, Oswald AJ (2001) Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Annales D’Economie et de Statistique 63/64:39–65.Google Scholar