An Efficient Algorithm for Continuous Bi-Criteria Traffic Assignment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.0761

References

  • Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1992) Route choice with heterogeneous drivers and group-specific congestion costs. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 22(1):71–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Gera H (2010) Traffic assignment by paired alternative segments. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(8–9):1022–1046.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckmann M, McGuire C, Winsten C (1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Blum JR (1954) Multidimensional stochastic approximation methods. Ann. Math. Statist. 25(4):737–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calderone D, Ratliff LJ (2019) Multi-dimensional continuous type population potential games. Proc. IEEE 58th Conf. Decision Control (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 5138–5143.Google Scholar
  • Calderone D, Dong R, Sastry SS (2017) External-cost continuous-type Wardrop equilibria in routing games. Proc. IEEE 20th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Chen PW, Nie YM (2013) Bicriterion shortest path problem with a general nonadditive cost. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:419–435.Google Scholar
  • Dafermos SC (1971) An extended traffic assignment model with applications to two-way traffic. Transportation Sci. 5(4):366–389.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos SC (1972) The traffic assignment problem for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Sci. 6(1):73–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos SC (1981) A Multicriteria Route-Mode Choice Traffic Equilibrium Model, Lefschetz Center for Dynamical Systems (Brown University, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (1983) Stochastic network equilibrium with multiple vehicle types and asymmetric, indefinite link cost Jacobians. Transportation Sci. 17(3):282–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dembo RS, Steihaug T (1983) Truncated-Newton algorithms for large-scale unconstrained optimization. Math. Programming 26(2):190–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1979) A model and algorithm for multicriteria route-mode choice. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 13(4):311–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1996) Bicriterion traffic assignment: Basic theory and elementary algorithms. Transportation Sci. 30(2):93–111.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1997) Bicriterion traffic assignment: Efficient algorithms plus examples. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 31(5):357–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1999a) Network-optimized road pricing: Part I: A parable and a model. Oper. Res. 47(1):54–64.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1999b) Network-optimized road pricing: Part II: Algorithms and examples. Oper. Res. 47(2):327–336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (2006) A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(10):917–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelson L, Lindberg PO (2006) Congestion pricing of road networks with users having different time values. Lawphongpanich S, Hearn DW, Smith MJ, eds. Mathematical and Computational Models for Congestion Charging (Springer, New York), 81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng L, Xie J, Nie YM, Liu X (2020) Efficient algorithm for the traffic assignment problem with side constraints. Transportation Res. Rec. 2674(4):129–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank M, Wolfe P (1956) An algorithm for quadratic programming. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 3(1–2):95–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fukushima M (1984) A modified Frank-Wolfe algorithm for solving the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 18(2):169–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X, Yang H (2009) User heterogeneity and bi-criteria system optimum. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 43(4):379–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang H, Li Z (2007) A multiclass, multicriteria logit-based traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(3):1464–1477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jayakrishnan R, Wei TT, Prashker JN, Rajadhyaksha S (1994) A faster path-based algorithm for traffic assignment. Trans. Res. Record 1443:75–83.Google Scholar
  • Lawphongpanich S, Hearn DW (1984) Simplical decomposition of the asymmetric traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 18(2):123–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee DH, Nie YM, Chen A, Leow YC (2002) Link-and path-based traffic assignment algorithms: Computational and statistical study. Transportation Res. Rec. 1783(1):80–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leurent F (1993) Cost versus time equilibrium over a network. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 71(2):205–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leurent F (1995) The practice of a dual criteria assignment model with continuously distributed values-of-time. Proc. 23rd Eur. Transport Forum (PTRC, London), 117–128.Google Scholar
  • Leurent F (1996) The theory and practice of a dual criteria assignment model with a continuously distributed value-of-time. Lesort JB, ed. Proc. Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (Pergamon, Exeter, UK), 455–477.Google Scholar
  • Leurent F, Coulombel N, Poulhès A (2012) A disaggregate residential equilibrium assignment model. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 54:758–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li WV, Kockelman KM, Huang Y (2021) Traffic and welfare impacts of credit-based congestion pricing applications: An Austin case study. Transportation Res. Rec. 2675(1):10–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Liu Y, Xie J (2020) A path-based equilibrium model for ridesharing matching. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 138:373–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Light T (2009) Optimal highway design and user welfare under value pricing. J. Urban Econom. 66(2):116–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Nie YM, Hall J (2015) A semi-analytical approach for solving the bottleneck model with general user heterogeneity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 71:56–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lo HK, Luo XW, Siu BWY (2006) Degradable transport network: Travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(9):792–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas K, Van Wee B, Maat K (2016) A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation (Amsterdam) 43(3):473–490.Google Scholar
  • Marcotte P (1998) Reformulations of a bicriterion equilibrium model. Fukushima M, Qi L, eds. Reformulation: Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), 269–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Zhu D (1994) An efficient algorithm for a bicriterion traffic assignment problem. Bianco L, Toth P, eds. Advanced Methods in Transportation Analysis (Springer, Berlin), 63–73.Google Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Zhu D (1997) Equilibria with infinitely many differentiated classes of customers. Ferris MC, Pang JS, eds. Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of Art (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA), 234–258.Google Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Zhu D (2009) Existence and computation of optimal tolls in multiclass network equilibrium problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 37(3):211–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Nguyen S, Tanguay K (1996) Implementation of an efficient algorithm for the multiclass traffic assignment problem. Lesort JB, ed. Proc. 13th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (Pergamon, New York), 217–236.Google Scholar
  • Martens K, Golub A, Robinson G (2012) A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the united states. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 46(4):684–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayet J, Hansen M (2000) Congestion pricing with continuously distributed values of time. J. Transport Econom. Policy 34(3):359–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng Q, Liu Z, Wang S (2012) Optimal distance tolls under congestion pricing and continuously distributed value of time. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(5):937–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D, Shapley LS (1996) Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. 14(1):124–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mote J, Murthy I, Olson DL (1991) A parametric approach to solving bicriterion shortest path problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 53(1):81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A (2000) A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model. Math. Comput. Modeling 32(3–4):393–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A, Dong J (2002) A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model with elastic demand. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 36(5):445–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nie YM (2006) A programmer’s manual for toolkit of network modeling (TNM). University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  • Nie YM (2010) A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(1):73–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nie YM (2011) Multi-class percentile user equilibrium with flow-dependent stochasticity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(10):1641–1659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nie YM, Liu Y (2010) Existence of self-financing and pareto-improving congestion pricing: Impact of value of time distribution. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 44(1):39–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical Optimization (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pigou AC (1920) The Economics of Welfare (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  • Powell MJ (1978) A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. Watson GA, ed. Numerical Analysis (Springer, Berlin), 144–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quandt RE (1967) A probabilistic abstract mode model. Studies in Travel Demand VIII (Mathematica Inc., Princeton, NJ), 127–149.Google Scholar
  • Schneider M (1968) Access and land development. Special Report 97, Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban Transportation Networks, vol. 6 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Spitzer JJ (1977) A numerically stable and efficient technique for the maintenance of positive definiteness in the Hessian for Newton-type methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 3(2):105–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan Z, Yang H (2012) The impact of user heterogeneity on road franchising. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(5):958–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Wee B, Geurs K (2011) Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. Eur. J. Transport Infrastructure Res. 11(4):350–367.Google Scholar
  • Verhoef ET, Small KA (2004) Product differentiation on roads: Constrained congestion pricing with heterogeneous users. J. Transport Econom. Policy 38(1):127–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59(2):251–261.Google Scholar
  • Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Institution Civil Engrg. 1(3):325–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J, Nie YM (2019) A new algorithm for achieving proportionality in user equilibrium traffic assignment. Transportation Sci. 53(2):566–584.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J, Nie YM, Liu X (2018) A greedy path-based algorithm for traffic assignment. Transportation Res. Rec. 2672(48):36–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Z, Xie J, Liu X, Nie YM (2020) Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 143:102102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Huang H (2004) The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 38(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Huang H (2005) Mathematical and Economic Theory of Road Pricing (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.