Unique Strategies and Average Treatment Effects

References

• Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, Sonka ST, Temu A, Waized B, Wormald A (2025) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 36(2):601–625.Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W, Hawk A, Pacheco-de-Almeida G (2018) Applying random coefficient models to strategy research: Identifying and exploring firm heterogeneous effects. Strategy Sci. 3(3):533–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Zott C (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):493–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• APA: Bezos JP (2016) 2015 letter to shareholders. Amazon.com, Inc. https://s2.q4cdn.com/299287126/files/doc_financials/annual/2015-Letter-to-Shareholders.PDF.Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.Link, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Stern S (1998) An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complimentarity in Organizational Design (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2016) Solving heterogeneous estimating equations with gradient forests. Preprint, submitted October 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01271.Google Scholar
• Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Guiso L, Prat A, Sadun R (2011) What do CEOs do? Preprint, submitted February 9, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1758445.Google Scholar
• Barney J (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Chatterji AK, Daley B (2017) Eponymous entrepreneurs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(6):1638–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett V (2024) How far can we push toward causal identification in a field focused on novelty, uniqueness, and complementarity? Accessed August 12, 2026, https://tinyurl.com/vbennett2024.Google Scholar
• Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2020) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2010) Recent advances in the empirics of organizational economics. Annu. Rev. Econom. 2(1):105–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Lemos R, Sadun R, Scur D, Van Reenen J (2014) JEEA-FBBVA Lecture 2013: The new empirical economics of management. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):835–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Pignataro A (2024a) Theory-driven strategic management decisions. Strategy Sci. 9(4):382–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C (2024b) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision-making: Large-scale replication and extension. Strategic Management J. 45(6):1209–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Krueger AB (1995) Time-series minimum-wage studies: A meta-analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(2):238–243.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Hall T, Dillon K, Duncan DS (2016) Competing Against Luck: The Story of Innovation and Customer Choice (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Coali A, Gambardella A, Novelli E (2024) Scientific decision-making, project selection and longer-term outcomes. Res. Policy 53(6):105022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Santaló J (2023) The hidden costs of fairness in platform markets: The dynamics of lowering developer royalty rates. Preprint, submitted April 12, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4403845.Google Scholar
• Cummings T, Nickerson J (2024) A protocol mechanism for solving the “right” strategic problem. Strategic Management Rev. 5(3):273–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 25(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Winter SG (2003) The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management J. 24(10):977–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drnevich PL, Mahoney JT, Schendel D (2020) Has strategic management research lost its way? Strategic Management Rev. 1(1):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupas P (2014) Short-run subsidies and long-run adoption of new health products: Evidence from a field experiment. Econometrica 82(1):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1997) Effective interim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrig T, Zenger T (2024) Competing with theories: Using awareness and confidence to secure resources and rents. Strategy Sci. 9(4):416–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans GW, Honkapohja S (2005) An interview with Thomas J. Sargent. Macroeconom. Dynamics 9(4):561–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Litov L, Yang M-J, Zenger T (2026) The technological uniqueness paradox. Strategic Management J. 47(5):1211–1243.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2016) Strategy, problems, and a theory for the firm. Organ. Sci. 27(1):222–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Zenger T (2021) Value lab: A tool for entrepreneurial strategy. Management Bus. Rev. 1(2):68–77.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Novelli E, Zenger T (2024) A scientific method for startups. J. Management 50(8):3080–3104.Google Scholar
• Findley MG, Kikuta K, Denly M (2021) External validity. Ann. Rev. Political Sci. 24(1):365–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A, Hendren N (2020) Welfare analysis meets causal inference. J. Econom. Perspect. 34(4):146–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hullman J, Kennedy L (2024) Causal quartets: Different ways to attain the same average treatment effect. Amer. Statist. 78(3):267–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glied S (2021) Price transparency—Promise and peril. JAMA 325(15):1496–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J (2021) Treatment effects in managerial strategies. Preprint, submitted October 4, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3915606.Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 US States, 1988–2014. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(4):212–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammonds KH (2001) Michael Porter’s big ideas. https://www.fastcompany.com/42485/michael-porters-big-ideas/.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (2000) Causal parameters and policy analysis in economics: A twentieth century retrospective. Quart. J. Econom. 115(1):45–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Pinto R (2024) Econometric causality: The central role of thought experiments. J. Econom. 243(1–2):105719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heiman B, Nickerson J, Zenger T (2009) Governing knowledge creation: A problem-finding and problem-solving perspective. Foss NJ, Michailova S, eds. Knowledge Governance: Processes and Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helmer H (2016) 7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy (Deep Strategy LLC, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Hong B, Kueng L, Yang M-J (2019) Complementarity of performance pay and task allocation. Management Sci. 65(11):5152–5170.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoopes D, Madsen TL, Teece D (2022) Introduction to the special issue honoring Richard Rumelt: The foundations for understanding fundamental issues in strategy. Strategic Management Rev. 3(2):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichinowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• Jackson CK, Mackevicius CL (2024) What impacts can we expect from school spending policy? Evidence from evaluations in the United States. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 16(1):412–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leamer E, Leonard H (1983) Reporting the fragility of regression estimates. Rev. Econom. Statist. 65(2):306–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Ryall M (2024) Duty to elaborate one’s causal theory: Toward a new norm for empirical reporting in strategy. Working paper, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Macher JT (2009) The problem solving perspective: A strategic approach to understanding environment and organization. Nickerson JA, Silverman BS, eds. Economic Institutions of Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 26 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 97–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.Link, Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Zenger TR (2011) Do investors value uniqueness in corporate strategy? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Preprint, submitted March 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1787795.Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Clarke C, Camerer C (2012) Robust analogizing and the outside view: Two empirical tests of case-based decision making. Strategic Management J. 33(5):496–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 58(6):1255–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Silverman BS (2003) Why aren’t all truck drivers owner-operators? Asset ownership and the employment relation in interstate for-hire trucking. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):91–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Zenger T (2004) A knowledge-based theory of governance choice—A problem-solving approach. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Wuebker R, Zenger T (2017) Problems, theories, and governing the crowd. Strategic Organ. 15(2):275–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Yen CJ, Mahoney JT (2012) Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach for designing organizations. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):52–72.Google Scholar
• Notturno M (2012) Karl Popper’s introduction to scientific method, as constructed by Mark A. Notturno. Unpublished manuscript, December, http://www.the-rathouse.com/Intro-Philos-Sci/Introduction.html.Google Scholar
• Novelli E, Spina C (2024a) How do entrepreneurs benefit from acting like scientists in business model development? Strategic commitments, uncertainty and economic performance. Strategic. Management J.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novelli E, Spina C (2024b) Making business model decisions like scientists: Strategic commitment, uncertainty, and economic performance. Strategic Management J. 45(13):2642–2695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch D (2024) Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy. Strategic Management J. 45(8):1539–1566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch DA (2020) The origins of firm strategy: Learning by economic experimentation and strategic pivots in the early automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 41(3):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1981) The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Acad. Management Rev. 6(4):609–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York). Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2008) On Competition, updated and expanded ed. (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(3):79–91.Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG (2012) Presidential address: The corporation in finance. J. Finance 67(4):1173–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Milgrom P (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management 26(3):556–570.Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (2011) Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (Crown Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (2022) The Crux: How Leaders Become Strategists (Profile Books, London).Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP, Schendel D, Teece DJ (1991) Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sorenson O (2025) The causal inference problem: When can managers use data to inform decisions and how can organization design help them? Acad. Management Rev.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2018) The cognitive foundations of visionary strategy. Strategy Sci. 3(1):335–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2017) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Chakravarthy B, Mueller-Stewens G, Lorange P, Lechner C, eds. Strategy Process: Shaping the Contours of the Field (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T (2024) How far can we push toward causal identification in a field focused on novelty, uniqueness, and complementarity? https://tinyurl.com/simcoe2024.Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2024) Theory, search, and learning. Strategy Sci. 9(4):372–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Stenholm P, Acs ZJ, Wuebker R (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J. Bus. Ventures 28(1):176–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2017) A formal theory of strategy. Management Sci. 63(8):2616–2636.Link, Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wuebker R, Zenger T, Felin T (2023) The theory-based view: Entrepreneurial microfoundations, resources, and choices. Strategic Management J. 44(12):2922–2949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M-J, Christensen M, Bloom N, Sadun R, Rivkin J (2024) How Do CEOs Make Strategy? (National Bureau of Economic Research).Google Scholar
• Zenger T (2013) What is the theory of your firm. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(6):72–78.Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Barney JB (2026) Invisible firms, competitive neglect, and sustained profit generation. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar