Multiple Experts vs. Multiple Methods: Combining Correlation Assessments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1030.0008

References

  • Ariely D., Au W. T., Bender R. H., Budescu D. V., Dietz C. B., Gu H., Wallsten T. S., Zauberman G. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (2000) 6:130–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown R. V., Lindley D. V. Plural analysis: Multiple approaches to quantitative research. Theory Decision (1986) 20:133–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Internat. J. Forecasting (1989) 5:559–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. L. Limits for precision and value of information from dependent sources. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:427–442LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. L. Combining economic forecasts. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1986) 4:39–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. L. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. (1999) 19:187–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Fischer G. W., Winkler R. L. Assessing dependence: Some experimental results. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1100–1115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewispelare A., Herren L., Clemen R. T. The use of probability elicitation for high-level nuclear waste regulation. Internat. J. Forecasting (1995) 11:5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinmuntz D. N., Hogarth R. M. Decomposition and the control of error in decision-analytic models. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 107–126Google Scholar
  • Lindley D. V. The reconciliation of decision analyses. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:289–295LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Makridakis S., Winkler R. L. Averages of forecasts: Some empirical results. Management Sci. (1983) 29:987–996LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan M. G., Keith D. W. Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environ. Sci. Tech. (1995) 29:468A–476AGoogle Scholar
  • Ravinder H. V., Kleinmuntz D. N., Dyer J. S. The reliability of subjective probabilities obtained through decomposition. Management Sci. (1988) 34:186–199LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soll J. B. Intuitive theories of information: Belief about the value of redundancy. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:317–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Winkler R. L. Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Sci. (1981) 27:479–488LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test (1996) 5:1–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.