Analysis of Correlated Expert Judgments from Extended Pairwise Comparisons

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0031

References

  • Bradley R., Terry M. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. Biometrica (1952) 39:324–345Google Scholar
  • Clemen R. T. Calibration and aggregation of probabilities. Management Sci. (1986) 32(3):312–314LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T. Combining overlapping information. Management Sci. (1987) 33(3):373–380LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):208–224LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. L. Limits for the precision and value of information from dependent sources. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:427–442LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. L. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. (1999) 19(2):187–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke R. M.Experts in Uncertainty: Expert Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science (1991) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1972) 34:187–220Google Scholar
  • Dawes R. M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. (1979) 34:571–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeWispelare A., Herren L., Clemen R. The use of probability elicitation in the high-level nuclear waste recognition program. Internat. J. Forecasting (1995) 11(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S. Updating belief in the light of someone else's opinion. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (1980) 143:43–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S. Consensus of opinion. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1981) 7:332–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jouini M. N., Clemen R. T. Copula models for aggregating expert opinion. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(3):444–457LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane J. B., Dickey J. M., Winkler R. L., Smith W. S., Peters S. C. Interactive elicitation of opinion for a normal linear model. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1980) 75(372):845–854CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindley D. Reconciliation of probability distributions. Oper. Res. (1983) 31:866–880LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindley D., Bernado J. M., DeGroot M. H., Lindley D. V., Smith A. F. M. Reconciliation of discrete probability distributions. Bayesian Statistics 2 (1985) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 375–390Google Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., van Dorp J. R. Speaking the truth in maritime risk assessment. (2004a) . In preparationGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., van Dorp J. R., Dinesh V. Assessing uncertainty in simulation based maritime risk assessment. Risk Anal. (2004b) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., van Dorp J. R., Harrald J., Mazzuchi T., Spahn J., Grabowski M. A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound. Systems Engrg. (2000) 3(3):128–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., van Dorp J. R., Mazzuchi T., Harrald J., Spahn J., Grabowski M. The Prince William Sound Risk Assessment. Interfaces (2002) 32(6):25–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morris P. A. Decision analysis expert use. Management Sci. (1974) 20:1233–1241LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morris P. A. Combining expert judgments: A Bayesian approach. Management Sci. (1977) 23:679–693LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morris P. A. An axiomatic approach to expert resolution. Management Sci. (1983) 29:24–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moslesh A., Bier V., Apostolakis G. Critique of the current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1988) 20:63–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Press S. J.Applied Multivariate Analysis Using Bayesian and Frequentist Methods and Inference (1982) 2nd ed.(Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL) Google Scholar
  • Pulkkinen U. Methods for combination of expert judgments. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1993) 40(2):111–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pulkkinen U. Bayesian analysis of consistent paired comparisons. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1994a) 43(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pulkkinen U. Gaussian paired comparison models. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1994b) 44(2):207–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saaty T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psych. (1977) 15(3):234–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szwed P., Rene van Dorp J., Merrick J. R. W., Mazzuchi T. A., Singh A. A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • van Dorp J. R., Merrick J. R. W., Harrald J., Mazzuchi T., Grabowski M. A risk management procedure for the Washington State Ferries. Risk Anal. (2001) 21(1):127–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler R. L. Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Sci. (1981) 27:479–488LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.