A Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis of Stakeholder Values to Identify Watershed Improvement Needs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0033

References

  • Adler R. Addressing barriers to watershed protection. Environ. Law (1995) 25:973–1106Google Scholar
  • Arnold C. L., Gibbons C. J. Addressing barriers to watershed management. (1996) . Environmental Protection Agency, Baltimore, MD (June 8–12). Accessed 25 January 2000, www.epa.gov/owow.watershed/Proceed/adler.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Belton V. The use of a simple multiple-criteria model to assist in selection from shortlist. Oper. Res. Soc. National Conf. (1984) (University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK) Google Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools Suite (2001) 1st ed.(Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Davis D. G. (1998) 28–29EPA's watershed approach. Water and Watersheds Program of the EPA/NSF Partnership for Environmental Research, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards W., Bell D., Keeney R., Raiffa H. Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Environmental Protection Agency Watershed protection: A project focus. (1995) . EPA-841-R-95-003. Accessed February 25, 2000, www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/focus/Google Scholar
  • Garcia M. Anatomy of a watershed. (1999) . Technical report, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L.Value Focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Keeney R., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making, Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., Garcia M. A value focused thinking approach to watershed improvement. J. Amer. Planning Association (2004) 70(3):313–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Research CouncilNew Strategies for America's Watersheds (1999) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Parnell G. Value-focused thinking using multiple objective decision analysis. Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis: Best Practices in Use Throughout the Department of Defense (2004) (Military Operations Research Society, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Parnell G., Conley H., Jackson J., Lehmkuhl L., Andrew J. Foundations 2025: A framework for evaluating future air and space forces. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1336–1350LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prato T. Risk-based multiattribute decision making in property and watershed management. Nat. Resource Model. (1999) 12:307–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prato T., Hajkowicz S. Selection and sustainability of land and water resource management systems. J. Amer. Water Resources Association (1999) 35:739–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qiu Z., Prato T., Fulcher C., Barnett Y. WAMADSS—An agricultural resource management tool for evaluating sustainable agriculture. J. Soil Water Conservation (1998) 53:159Google Scholar
  • Warner A. Developing an applied system of ecological indicators for measuring restoration progress in an urban watershed. (1996) . EPA, Baltimore, MD (June 8–12). Accessed 25 February 2000, www.epa.gov/OWOW.watershed/Proceed/warner.htmlGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.