Attribute Dominance Utility

References

• Abbas A. E., Williams C. An entropy approach for utility assignment in decision analysis. Proc. 22nd Internat. Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Moscow, Idaho (2002) (American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York) Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. Entropy methods in decision analysis. (2003a) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Erickson G. An information theory about preferences. Proc. 23rd Internat. Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Boise, Idaho (2003b) (American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York) Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. Entropy methods for joint distributions in decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Abbas A. E. Maximum entropy utility. Oper. Res. (2006) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Bacchus F., Grove A. Graphical models for preference and utility. Proc. 11th Annual Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI-1995) (1995) (Morgan Kauffman Publishers)Google Scholar
• Bell D. E. A utility function for time streams having inter-period dependencies. Oper. Res. (1977) 25:448–458Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E. Multiattribute utility functions: Decompositions using interpolation. Management Sci. (1979a) 25:744–753Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E. Consistent assessment procedures using conditional utility functions. Oper. Res. (1979b) 27:1054–1066Link, Google Scholar
• Boutilier C., Bacchus F., Brafman R. UCP networks: A directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. Proc. 17th Annual Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI-2001), Seattle, WA (2001) (Morgan Kauffman Publishers)Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45:208–223Link, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Fischer G. W., Winkler R. L. Assessing dependence. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1100–1115Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Sarin R. Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. (1982) 28:875–886Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Fishburn P., Steuer R., Wallenius J., Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years. Management Sci. (1992) 38:645–654Link, Google Scholar
• Farquhar P. H. A fractional hypercube decomposition theorem for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. (1975) 23:941–967Link, Google Scholar
• Farquhar P., Fishburn P. Finite degree utility independence. Math. Oper. Res. (1982) 7:348–353Link, Google Scholar
• Frank M. J. On the simultaneous associativity of F(x, y) and x + y = F(x, y). Aequationes Math. (1979) 19:194–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Multiattribute risk linearity. Management Sci. (1993) 39:389–394Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. On making life and death decisions. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1980) Vol. II(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Knowledge maps. Management Sci. (1989) 35:903–922Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Oliver R. M., Smith J. Q. From influence to revelance to knowledge. Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets, and Decision Analysis (1990) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1984/2005) Vol. II(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) 719–762Reprinted, Decision Anal. 2(3) 127–143Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L. Multiplicative utility functions. Oper. Res. (1974) 22:22–34Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. Analysis of preference dependencies among objectives. Oper. Res. (1981) 29:1105–1120Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C. W. Parametrically dependent preferences for multiattributed consequences. Oper. Res. (1976) 7:92–103Link, Google Scholar
• La Mura P., Shoham Y. Expected utility networks. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI '99), Stockholm, Sweden (1999) (Morgan Kauffman Publishers)Google Scholar
• Lowell D. G. Sensitivity to relevance in decision analysis. (1994) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Matheson J., Abbas A. E. Utility-transversality: A value-based approach. (2004) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. An introduction to decision analysis. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1968) Vol. I(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Meyer R. F., Bell D. E., Keeney R. L., Raiffa H. State-dependent time preference. Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (1977) (Wiley, London) 232–243Google Scholar
• Miller A. C., Merkhofer M. W., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Rice T. R.Development of Automated Aids for Decision Analysis (1976) (SRI International, Menlo Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelsen R. B.An Introduction to Copulas (1998) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Pearl J.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (1988) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar