Influence Diagrams for Team Decision Analysis

References

• Bellman R. E.Dynamic Programming (1957) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Detwarasiti A. Team decision analysis and influence diagrams. (2005) . Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Fagiuoli E., Zaffalon M. A note about redundancy in influence diagrams. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning (1998) 19:351–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger D., Verma T., Pearl J. Identifying independence in Bayesian networks. Networks (1990) 20:507–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Hertz D. B., Melese J. Decision analysis: Applied decision theory. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Oper. Res. (1966a) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) 55–71Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Information value theory. IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics (1966b) SSC-2:22–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. The evolution of decision analysis. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis I (1984) (Strategic Decision Group, Menlo Park, CA) 6–16Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis II (1984/2005) (Strategic Decision Group, Menlo Park, CA) 719–762Reprinted, Decision Anal. 2(3) 127–143Google Scholar
• Jensen F., Jensen F. V., Dittmer S. L., de Mantaras R. L., Poole D. From influence diagrams to junction trees. Proc. 10th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1994) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 367–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koller D., Milch B., Nebel B. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Proc. 17th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2001) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 1027–1034Google Scholar
• Koller D., Milch B. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games Econom. Behavior (2003) 45:181–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn H. W., Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W. Extensive games and the problem of information. Contributions to the Theory of Games II (1953) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 193–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauritzen S. L., Nilsson D. Representing and solving decision problems with limited information. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1235–1251Link, Google Scholar
• Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• McKelvey R. D., McLennan A., Amman H. M., Kendrick D. A., Rust J. Computation of equilibria in finite games. Handbook of Computational Economics I (1996) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands) 87–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey R. D., McLennan A. M., Turocy T. L.GAMBIT: Software Tools for Game Theory (2004) . http://econweb.tamu.edu/gambitGoogle Scholar
• Nash J. F. Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. (1951) 54:286–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen T. D., Benferhat S., Besnard P. Decomposition of influence diagrams. Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (2001) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 144–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen T. D., Jensen F. V., Laskey K. B., Prade H. Well defined decision scenarios. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 502–511Google Scholar
• Nilsson D., Lauritzen S. L., Boutilier C., Goldszmidt M. Evaluating influence diagrams using LIMIDs. Proc. 16th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2000) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 436–445Google Scholar
• Olmsted S. M. On representing and solving decision problems. (1983) . Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Pearl J.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (1988) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty (1968) (Addison-Wesley)Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:871–882Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D. Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1988) 36:589–604Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D., Cooper G. F., Moral S. Bayes-Ball: The rational pastime. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1998) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 480–487Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D., Laskey K. B., Prade H. Efficient value of information computation. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 594–601Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D., Peot M. A., Dubois D., Wellman M. P., D’Ambrosio B., Smets P. Decision making using probabilistic inference methods. Proc. 8th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1992) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) 276–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenoy P. P. Valuation-based systems for Bayesian decision analysis. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:463–484Link, Google Scholar
• Tatman J. A., Shachter R. D. Dynamic programming and influence diagrams. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1990) 20:365–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Zhang N. L., Cooper G. F., Moral S. Probabilistic inference in influence diagrams. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1998) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 514–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang N. L., Poole D., Nebel B., Rich C., Swartout W. R. Stepwise-decomposable influence diagrams. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Principles Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1992) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) 141–152Google Scholar
• Zhang N. L., Qi R., Poole D. A computational theory of decision networks. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning (1994) 11:83–158Crossref, Google Scholar