The Influence of Influence Diagrams on Artificial Intelligence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0054

References

  • Aström K. J. Optimal control of Markov decision processes with incomplete state estimation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1965) 10:174–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellman Richard E.Dynamic Programming (1957) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Binford Thomas O., Levitt Tod S. Evidential reasoning for object recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence (2003) 25(7):837–851CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boutilier Craig, Dean Thomas, Hanks Steve. Decision theoretic planning: Structural assumptions and computational leverage. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. (1999) 11:1–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dearden Richard. Learning and planning in structured worlds. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Guestrin Carlos, Hauskrecht Milos, Kveton Branislav. Solving factored mdps with continuous and discrete variables. Proc. Twentieth Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2004) (Banff, Alberta, Canada) 235–242Google Scholar
  • Horvitz Eric, Breese John S., Henrion Max. Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning (1988) 2:247–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard Ronald A.Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes (1960) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Howard Ronald A., Matheson James E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. Readings on the Princinples and Applications of Decision Analysis II (1984/2005) (Strategic Decision Group, Menlo Park, CA) 719–762Reprinted, Decision Anal. 2(3) 127–143Google Scholar
  • Koller Daphne, Milch Brian. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games Econom. Behavior (2003) 45(1):181–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Satia J. K., Lave R. E. Markov decision processes with uncertain transition probabilities. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:728–740LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapley Lloyd S. Stochastic games. Proc. National Academy Sci. (1953) 39:327–332Google Scholar
  • Tatman Joseph A., Shachter Ross D. Dynamic programming and influence diagrams. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man Cybernetics (1990) 20(2):365–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.