Use of Decision Analysis in the Army Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 Military Value Analysis
Published Online:1 Mar 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1060.0062
References
- An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Internat. J. Project Management (1999) 17:207–216Crossref, Google Scholar
- Center for Army Analysis Statistical significance of BRAC 95 attributes. (2003) . Report CAA-R-04-6, United States Army, Ft. Belvoir, VAGoogle Scholar
- Center for Army Analysis Decision analysis support for base realignment. (2004) . Report CAA-R-04-14, United States Army, Ft. Belvoir, VAGoogle Scholar
- Department of the Army Report to Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, Vol. III: Department of the Army, analysis and recommendation (March). (1995) Google Scholar
- Department of the Army Army stationing strategy. (2003) . Army G3, Department of the Army, The Pentagon, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
- Department of Defense 2005 final selection criteria. (2004) . Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Department of Defense Report to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, Vol III: Department of the army analysis and recommendations, BRAC 2005. (2005) . Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Measurable multi-attribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1979) 27:810–822Link, Google Scholar
- Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multiattribute preference theory. Management Sci. (1981) 27:174–189Link, Google Scholar
- Decision Making with Multiple Objectives (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
- Strategic Decision Making: Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
- Preference conditions for multi-attribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1980) 28:225–232Link, Google Scholar
- Strategic approaches for allocating capital in healthcare organizations. Healthcare Financial Management (1999) 53:52–58Google Scholar
- Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Value-focused thinking using multiple objective decision analysis. Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis: Best Practices in Use Throughout the Department of Defense (2006) (Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA) . Chapter 19Google Scholar
- Logical Decisions for Windows (1999) (Logical Decisions, Inc., Golden, CO) Google Scholar
- Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2003) 50:175–183Crossref, Google Scholar
- USMA study of the installation management agency CONUS region structure. (2004) . DSE-R-0506, DTIC ADA-427027, United States Military Academy, West Point, NYGoogle Scholar
- Ranking hydroelectric power projects with multicriteria decision analysis. Interfaces (1988) 18(4):36–48Link, Google Scholar

