Using Attributes to Predict Objectives in Preference Models

References

• Alba J., Hutchinson J. W. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 13:411–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa C. A., Ensslin L., Corrêa E. C., Vansnick J. C. DSS in action: Integrated application in a multi-criteria decision aid process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 113:315–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron F. H. Influence of missing attributes on selecting a best multiattributed alternative. Decision Sci. (1984) 18:194–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V., Ackermann F., Shepherd I. Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and VISA. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1997) 6:115–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J. R., Park C. W. Effects of prior knowledge, exposure, and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7:234–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borcherding K., von Winterfeldt D. The effect of varying value trees on multiattribute evaluations. Acta Psychologica (1988) 68:153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J. C., Jia J., Dyer J. S. Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103:531–545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J. C., Morrice D. J., Mullarkey P. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Sci. (2001) 47:800–816Link, Google Scholar
• Butler J. C., Dyer J. S., Jia J., Tomak K. Enabling E-transactions with multi-attribute preference models. (2006) . Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• Dawes R. M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. (1979) 34:571–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1990) 36:249–258Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Larsen J., Thrall, Thompson. Using multiple objectives to approximate normative models. Ann. Oper. Res. (1985) 2:39–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Lund R. N. Tinker toys and Christmas trees: Opening a new merchandising package for Amoco Oil Company. Interfaces (1982) 12:38–52Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Edmunds T., Butler J. C., Jia J. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:749–762Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Lund R., Larsen J., Kumar V., Leone R. A manpower allocation model for prioritizing oil and gas exploration. Oper. Res. (1990) 38:386–396Link, Google Scholar
• Ensslin L., Montibeller G., Lima M. V. A., Haimes Y. Y., Steuer R. E. Constructing and implementing a DSS to help evaluate perceived risk of accounts receivable. Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2000) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 248–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W. Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value models. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 62:252–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Damodaran N., Laskey K. B., Lincoln D. R. Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Sci. (1987) 33:198–214Link, Google Scholar
• Hammond J. S., Keeney R. L., Raiffa H. Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76:137–149Google Scholar
• Jia J., Fischer G. W., Dyer J. S. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1998) 11:85–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson Michael D. Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11:741–753Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L. Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Oper. Res. (2002) 50:935–945Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs (1993) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making (1996) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz D. N. The sensitivity of linear multiattribute utility models to attribute formulation. (1982) . Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• Laskey K. B., Fischer G. W. Estimating utility functions in the presence of response error. Management Sci. (1987) 33:965–980Link, Google Scholar
• Mitchell A. A., Dacin P. A. The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. (1996) 23:219–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montibeller G., Belton V. Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options—A review. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2005) 57:779–791Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montibeller G., Ackermann F., Belton V., Ensslin L. Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem structuring and multi-criteria evaluation. (2005) . Working Paper 2005/11, Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde. Available at: http://www.managementscience.org/research/ab0511.aspGoogle Scholar
• Nadkarni S., Shenoy P. P. A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 128:479–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S., Shenoy P. P. A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks. Decision Support Systems (2004) 38:259–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppewal H., Louviere J., Timmermans H. Modeling hierarchical conjoint processes with integrated choice experiments. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31:92–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravinder H. V., Kleinmuntz D. N. Random error in additive decompositions of multiattribute utility. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1991) 4:83–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravinder H. V., Kleinmuntz D. N., Dyer J. S. The reliability of subjective probability assessments obtained through decomposition. Management Sci. (1988) 34:186–199Link, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L., Ozdemir M. Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Math. Comput. Modeling (2003) 37:1063–1075Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo A. A., Hamalainen R. P. On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J. Multi-Criterion Decision Anal. (1997) 6:309–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7:99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. E., von Winterfeldt D. Decision analysis in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50:561–574Link, Google Scholar
• Stillwell W. G., von Winterfeldt D., John R. S. Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models. Management Sci. (1987) 33:442–450Link, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Eisenfuhr F., von Winterfeldt D. The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Sci. (1988) 34:431–445Link, Google Scholar
• West P. M., Brown C. L., Hoch S. J. Consumption vocabulary and preference formation. J. Consumer Res. (1996) 23:120–135Crossref, Google Scholar