A Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis for Terrorism Protection: Potassium Iodide Distribution in Nuclear Incidents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1060.0072

References

  • Borcherding K., Eppel T., von Winterfeldt D. Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Sci. (1991) 37(12):1603–1619LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buede D. M. Structuring value attributes. Interfaces (1986) 16(2):52–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen Robert T.Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1996) 2nd ed.(Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Corner J. L., Kirkwood C. W. Decision analysis applications in the operations research literature, 1970–1989. Oper. Res. (1991) 39:206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. S., Sarin R. K. Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):810–822LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards W., Barron F. H. Smarts and smarter: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 60:306–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FDA (Food and Drug Administration) FDA Talk Paper. FDA's guidance on protection of children and adults against thyroid cancer in case of nuclear accident. (2001) . FDA, Office of Public Affairs, Washington, D.C. (December 10)Google Scholar
  • Flüeler T.Decision Making for Complex Socio-Technical Systems: Robustness from Lessons Learned in Long-Term Radioactive Waste Governance. Series Environment and Policy (2005) 42(Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Ford C. K., Keeney R., Kirkwood C. W. Evaluating methodologies: A procedure and application to nuclear power plant siting methodologies. Management Sci. (1979) 25(1):1–10LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiménez A., Ríos-Insua S., Mateos A. A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments. Decision Support Systems (2003) 36(1):65–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazarians M., Siu N. O., Apostolakis G. Fire risk analysis for nuclear power plants: Methodological developments and applications. Risk Anal. (1985) 5(1):33–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer D. L., Kirkwood C. W., Corner J. L. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Ozernoy V. An illustrative analysis of ambient carbon monoxide standards. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1982) 33(4):365–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Sicherman A. Illustrative comparison of one utility's coal and nuclear choices. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(1):50–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R., Renn O., von Winterfeldt D. Structuring Germany's energy objectives. Energy Policy (1987) 15:352–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R., Kirkwood C. W. The founding of INFORMS: A decision analysis perspective. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(1):16–28LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Merrick J. R., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • NRC Committee to Assess the Distribution and Administration of Potassium Iodide in the Event of a Nuclear Incident, Board of Radiation Effects Research, Division of Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National AcademiesDistribution and Administration of Potassium Iodide in the Event of a Nuclear Incident (2004) (National Academies Press (NAP), Washington, D.C.) . Available on the NAP website at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10868.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Rosoff H., von Winterfeldt D. A risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Risk Anal. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Tengs T. O., Adams M., Pliskin J. S., Safran D. G., Siegel J. E., Weinstein M. C., Graham J. D. 500 life saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal. (1995) 15(3):369–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident. (2000) . Annex J, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Volume II: Effects. United Nations, New York and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D. Setting standards for offshore oil discharges: A regulatory decision analysis. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(5):867–886LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Kleindorfer P., Kunreuther H. Value tree analysis: An introduction and an application to offshore oil drilling. Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond (1987) (Springer, New York) 349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 274–275286287Google Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., O'Sullivan T. A decision analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MANPADS countermeasures. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Eppel T., Adams J., Neutra R., DelPizzo V. Managing potential health risks from electric powerlines: A decision analysis caught in controversy. Risk Anal. (2002) 24:1487–1502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winn M. I., Keller L. R., Wood D. J., Windsor D. Harnessing complexity, idiosyncrasy and time: A modeling methodology for corporate multi-stakeholder decisions. Proc. Tenth Annual Conf. Paris, France, Internat. Assoc. for Bus. and Soc. 1999 (1999) 482–487CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winn M. I., Keller L. R. A modeling methodology for multi-objective multi-stakeholder decisions: Implications for research. J. Management Inquiry (2001) 10:166–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.