The Respective Roles of Risk and Decision Analyses in Decision Support

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)External Review Panel Report to the NRC (2006) . Retrieved May 15, 2006, http://www.asce.orgGoogle Scholar
• Apostolakis G. The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. Science (1990) 250(December):1359–1364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balson W., Welsh J., Wilson D. Using decision analysis and risk analysis to manage utility environmental risk. Interfaces (1992) 22(6):126–139Link, Google Scholar
• Baron M. M., Paté-Cornell M. E. Designing risk management strategies for critical engineering systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1999) 46(1):87–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London (1763) 53:370–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedford T., Cooke R. M.Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods (2001) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E., Raiffa H., Tversky A.Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bier V. M. On the treatment of dependence in making decisions about risk. Trans. 10th Internat. Conf. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Tech. (1989) August 14–18International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Anaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
• Bier V. M., Cox L. A., Edward W., Miles R., von Winterfeldt D. Probabilistic risk analysis for engineered systems. Advances in Decision Analysis (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Bodily S. Introduction: The practice of decision and risk analysis. Interfaces (1992) 22(6):1–4Link, Google Scholar
• Brown R. The operation was a success but the patient died: Aider priorities influence decision aid usefulness. Interfaces (2005) 35(6):511–521Link, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T.Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1996) (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Cooke R. M.Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covello V., Mumpower J. Risk analysis and risk management: A historical perspective. Risk Anal. (1985) 5(2):103–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davoudian K., Wu J.-S., Apostolakis G. Incorporating organizational factors into risk assessment through the analysis of work processes. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1994) 45:85–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Finetti B., Kyburg H. E., Smokler H. E. La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives [Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources]. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré [Studies in Subjective Probability] (1937) 7:1–68[Translated by Wiley, New York, 1964, 91–158.]Google Scholar
• Deisler P. F., Schwing R. C. History of the Society for Risk Analysis through the year 2000. (2000) . White paper, Society of Risk Analysis. Retrieved May 15, 2006, http://www.sra.orgGoogle Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75:643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbeck Paul S. Epistemic uncertainty in rational decision making. (1991) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Fishburn Peter C.Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory (1988) (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Freudenburg W. Perceived risk, real risk: Social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science (1988) 242(October):44–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibb S. Internal memo details possible EPA staff concerns with OMB risk guide. Risk Newsletter: Soc. Risk Anal. (2006) 26(2):11Google Scholar
• Guikema S., Paté-Cornell M. E. Optimization of system and component reinforcement with discrete risk/cost functions. Proc. PSAM6 (2002) (June)International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assesment and Management. San Juan, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
• Haimes Y. Y. Total risk management. Risk Anal. (1991) 11(2):169–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haimes Y. Y.Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management (2004) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartford D., Baecher G.Risk and Uncertainty in Dam Safety (2004) (Thomas Telford, Ltd., London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helton J. C. Treatment of uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Risk Anal. (1994) 14:483–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helton J. C. Probability, conditional probability and complementary cumulative distribution functions in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1996) 54:145–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henley E., Kumamoto H.Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Reliability Engineering, Design, and Analysis (1992) (IEEE Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Decision analysis: Perspectives on inference, decision, and experimentation. Proc. IEEE (1970) 58(5):823–834Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. An assessment of decision analysis. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(1):4–27Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. (1988a) 34(6):679–695Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Uncertainty about probability: A decision analysis perspective. Risk Anal. (1988b) 8(1):91–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A.Decision Analysis (1995) . Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Hunter J. H. False claims. New York Times (2006) May 4):A31Google Scholar
• Interagency Performance Evaluation Task Force (IPET)Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System (2006) . U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved May 15, 2006, http://ipet.wes.army.milGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S., Garrick B. J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. (1981) 1(1):11–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. Decision analysis: An overview. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(5):803–838Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R.Value-Focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. Making better decision makers. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):193–204Link, Google Scholar
• Knight F. A.Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (1921) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkhofer M. W., Keeney R. L. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternate sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Anal. (1987) 7:173–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Modarres M.What Every Engineer Should Know About Reliability and Risk Analysis (1993) (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Mosleh A., Goldfeiz E. B. An approach for assessment the impact of organizational factors on risk. (1995) . Report UMNE-95-003, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Murphy D. M., Paté-Cornell M. E. The SAM framework: A systems analysis approach to modeling the effects of management on human behavior in risk analysis. Risk Anal. (1996) 16(4):501–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC)Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (1983) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC)Stern P. C., Fineberg H. V.Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (1996) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E. Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: The case of offshore platforms. Science (1990) 250(November 30):1210–1217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E. Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1996) 54:95–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Edward W., Miles R., von Winterfeldt D. The engineering risk analysis method and some applications. Advances in Decision Analysis (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Davis D. B. A challenge to the compound lottery axiom: A two-stage normative structure and comparison to other theories. Theory Decision (1994) 37(3):267–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Fischbeck P. PRA as a management tool: Organizational factors and risk-based priorities for the maintenance of the tiles of the space shuttle orbiter. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1993) 40:239–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Fischbeck P. Risk management for the tiles of the space shuttle. Interfaces (1994) 24(January–February):64–86Link, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Guikema S. D. Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Oper. Res. (2002) 7(4):5–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Murphy D. M. Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: The SAM approach and observations from recent applications. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1996) 53:115–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M. E., Murphy D. M., Lakats L. M., Gaba D. M. Patient risk in anesthesia: Probabilistic risk analysis, management effects and improvements. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 67:211–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H., Schlaifer R.Applied Statistical Decision Theory (1968) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Ramsey F. P., Braithwaite R. B. Truth and probability. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (1931) (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L.Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1990) (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Slovic P.The Perception of Risk (2000) (Earthscan Publications, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science (1969) 165:1232–1238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. CongressLake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Louisiana (1965) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) . House Document 231, 89th Cong., 1st SessionGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) Reactor Safety Study: Assessment of Accident Risk in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Plants, WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014). (1975) (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D. Applications of decision models. (2002) . Presentation to Fuqua Global Business Students, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D., Schweitzer E. An assessment of tritium supply alternatives in support of the US nuclear weapons stockpile. Interfaces (1998) 28(1):92–118Link, Google Scholar
• Zeckhauser R., Viscusi W. K. Risk within reason. Science (1990) 248(May):559–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman R., Bier V. Risk assessment of extreme events. (2002) . White paper, Center for Hazards and Risk Research, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar