Using a Software Tool for Public Decision Analysis: The Case of Nacka Municipality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1070.0088

References

  • Aven T., Kørte J. On the use of risk and decision analysis to support decision making. Reliability Engrg. Systems Safety (2003) 29(3):289–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron F. H. Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica (1992) 80(1–3):91–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeva V., De Baets B., Tsiporkova E. Ranking of admissible alternatives in interval decision making. Internat. J. Systems Sci. (2004) 36:897–907CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brouwers L., Danielson M., Ekenberg L., Hansson K. Simulation and decision analysis of flood management strategies. J. Risk, Decision, Policy (2004) 9(1):23–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cano A., Moral S. A review of propagation algorithms for imprecise probabilities. Proc. 1st Internat. Sympos. Imprecise Probab. Their Appl. (1999) Ghent, Belgium http://decsai.ugr.es/∼smc/isipta99/proc/065.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Choquet G. Theory of capacities.. Annales de l’institut Fourier (1953/1954) 5:131–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson M. Handling imperfect user statements in real-life decision analysis. Internat. J. Inform. Tech. Decision Making (2004) 3(3):513–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson M. Generalized evaluation in decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 162(2):442–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson M., Ekenberg L. A framework for analysing decisions under risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 104(3):474–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson M., Ekenberg L. Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 181(2):808–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson M., Ekenberg L., Grönlund Å., Larsson A. Public decision support—Using a DSS to increase democratic transparency. Internat. J. Public Inform. Systems (2005) 1:3–25Google Scholar
  • Danielson M., Ekenberg L., Johansson J., Larsson A. The DecideIT decision tool. Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Imprecise Probab. Their Appl. (2003) Lugano, Switzerland(Carleton Scientific, Waterloo, Ontario) 204–217Google Scholar
  • Dempster A. P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. (1967) 38(2):325–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denneberg D.Non-Additive Measure and Integral (1994) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ekenberg L., Thorbiörnson J. Second-order decision analysis. Internat. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems (2001) 9(1):13–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S., Xu D.-L. Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (2005) 13:65–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gärdenfors P., Sahlin N.-E. Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making. Synthese (1988) 53:361–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hornberger J., Lenert L. Variation among quality-of-life surveys. Med. Care (1996) 34(12 supp):DS23–DS33Google Scholar
  • Huber P. J. The case of Choquet capacities in statistics. Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst. (1973) 45:181–188Google Scholar
  • Huber P. J., Strassen V. Minimax tests and the Neyman-Pearson’s lemma for capacities. Ann. Statist. (1973) 1:251–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Idefeldt J., Larsson A., Danielson M. Preference ordering algorithms with imprecise expectations. Proc. 2006 Internat. MultiConference Engineers Comput. Scientists (2006) Hong Kong, China(Newswood Limited, Hongkong, China) 750–755Google Scholar
  • Katsikopoulos V. K., Fasolo B. New tools for decision analysts. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics—Part A: Systems Humans (2006) 36(5):960–967CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Klir G. J. Uncertainty and information measures for imprecise probabilities: An overview. Proc. 1st Internat. Sympos. Imprecise Probab. Their Appl. (1999) Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Kyburg H. E.Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief (1961) (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT) Google Scholar
  • Larsson A., Johansson J., Ekenberg L., Danielson M. Decision analysis with multiple objectives in a framework for evaluating imprecision. Internat. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems (2005) 13(5):495–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell D. T. Improving hard decisions. OR/MS Today (2006) . http://www.lionhrtpub.com/orms/orms-12-06/frdas.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Mustajoki J., Hämäläinen R. P., Salo A. A. Decision support by interval SMART/SWING—Incorporating imprecision in the SMART and SWING methods. Decision Sci. (2005) 36(2):317–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salo A. A., Hämäläinen R. P. Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(6):1053–1061LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salo A. A., Hämäläinen R. P. Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 82(3):458–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salo A. A., Hämäläinen R. P. Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)—Elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics—Part A: Systems Humans (2001) 31(6):533–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salo A. A., Punkka A. Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 163(2):338–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer G.A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (1976) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith C. A. B. Consistency in statistical inference and decision. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1961) 23:1–37Google Scholar
  • Walley P.Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities (1991) (Chapman and Hall, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weichselberger K. The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty. Proc. 1st Internat. Sympos. Imprecise Probab. Their Appl. (1999) Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Weichselberger K., Pöhlman S.A Methodology for Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (1990) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Yager R. R., Fedrizzi M., Kacprzyk J.Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.