Some Comparisons among Quadratic, Spherical, and Logarithmic Scoring Rules

References

• Brier G. W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. (1950) 78(1):1–3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cover T. M., Thomas J. A.Elements of Information Theory (1991) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman D. An effective scoring rule for probability distributions. (1979) . Discussion Paper 164, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Friedman D. Effective scoring rules for probabilistic forecasts. Management Sci. (1983) 29(4):447–454Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen F. A., Peterson C. R. Psychological effects of proper scoring rules. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1973) 9:307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C. W. Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):51–67Link, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl K. C., Winkler R. L. Probability elicitation, scoring rules, and competition among forecasters. Management Sci. (2007) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H., Winkler R. L. Scoring rules in probability assessment and evaluation. Acta Psych. (1970) 34:273–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H., Winkler R. L. Forecasters and probability forecasts: Some current problems. Bull. Amer. Meteorological Soc. (1971) 52(4):239–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nau R. F. Should scoring rules be “effective”? Management Sci. (1985) 31(5):527–535Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips L. D., Edwards W. Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. J. Experiment. Psych. (1966) 72(3):346–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roby T. B. Belief states: A preliminary empirical study. Behavioral Sci. (1965) 10(3):255–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage. Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1971) 66:783–801Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R. Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule. Experiment. Econom. (1998) 1:43–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shuford E. H., Albert A., Massengill H. E. Admissible probability measurement procedures. Psychometrika (1966) 31(2):125–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staël von Holstein C.-A. S.Assessment and Evaluation of Subjective Probability Distributions (1970) . The Economic Research Institute at the Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
• Toda M. Measurement of subjective probability distributions. (1963) . ESD-TDR-63-407, Decision Sciences Laboratory, Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
• Winkler R. L. “Good” probability assessors. J. Appl. Meteorology (1968) 7:751–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1969) 64(327):1073–1078Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Probabilistic prediction: Some experimental results. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1971) 66(336):675–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test (1996) 5(1):1–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L., Murphy A. H. Nonlinear utility and the probability score. J. Appl. Meteorology (1970) 9:143–148Crossref, Google Scholar