An Elicitation Procedure for the Generalized Trapezoidal Distribution with a Uniform Central Stage

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1070.0093

References

  • AbouRizk S. M., Halpin D. W., Wilson J. R. Visual interactive fitting of beta distributions. J. Construction Engrg. Management (1992) 117(4):589–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alpert M., Raiffa H., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 294–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks J., Carson J. S., Nelson B. L., Nicol D. M.Discrete-Event System Simulation (2005) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bardosi G., Fodor J.Evaluation of Uncertainty and Risks in Geology (2004) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L. An SAB Report: Estimating uncertainties in radiogenic cancer risk. (1999) . Science and Advisory Board, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-SAB-RAC-99-008, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Chen S. J., Hwang C. L.Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: Methods and Applications (1992) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson L. B., Cooper D. O. Implementing effective risk analysis at Getty Oil Company. Interfaces (1980) 10:62–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis C., Sorenson K.Handbook of Applied Hydraulics (1969) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • DeBrota D. J., Roberts S. D., Dittus R. S., Wilson J. R. Visual interactive fitting of bounded Johnson distributions. Simulation (1989) 52:199–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denham R., Mengersen K. Geographically assisted elicitation of expert opinion for regression models. Bayesian Anal. (2007) 2(1):99–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeWispelare A. R., Herren L. T., Clemen R. T. The use of probability elicitation in the high-level nuclear waste recognition program. Internat. J. Forecasting (1995) 11(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flehinger B. J., Kimmel M. The natural history of lung cancer in periodically screened population. Biometrics (1987) 43:127–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garthwaite P. H., Kadane J. B., O'Hagan A. Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(470):680–701CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garvey P. R.Probability Methods for Cost Uncertainty Analysis, a Systems Engineering Perspective (2000) (Marcel Dekker, New York) Google Scholar
  • Herrerías R. Utilización de Modelos Probabilísticos Alternativas para el Métedo PERT, Applicación al Análisis de Inversiones. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valladolid (1989) (Valladolid, Spain) 89–112Google Scholar
  • Herrerías R., Calvete H. Una ley de probabilidad para el estudio de los flujos de caja de una inversión. Libro Homenaje al Profesor Gonzalo Arnaiz Vellando (1987) (ICE, Madrid, Spain) 279–296Google Scholar
  • Johnson M. A., Taaffe M. R. An investigation of phase-type distribution moment-matching algorithms for use in queuing models. Queueing Systems (1991) 8(1):129–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlis D., Xekalaki E. Improving the EM algorithm for mixtures. Statist. Comput. (1999) 9(4):303–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer D. L., Bodily S. E. Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):595–609LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer D. L., Verdini A. V. Better estimation of PERT activity time parameters. Management Sci. (1993) 39(9):1086–1091LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kimmel M., Gorlova O. Y. Stochastic models of progression of cancer and their use in controlling cancer-related mortality. Internat. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. (2003) 13(3):279–287Google Scholar
  • Kotz S., van Dorp J. R. A novel method for fitting unimodal continuous distributions on a bounded domain. IIE Trans. (2006) 38:421–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merkhofer M. W. Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1987) SMC-17(5):741–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakao A., Iwaki M. RBS study on Na-implanted polystyrene at various doses. Appl. Phys. A, Materials Sci. Procession (2000) 71(2):181–183Google Scholar
  • O'Hagan A., Upadhyay S. K., Singh U., Dey D. K. Research in elicitation. Bayesian Statistics and Its Application (2006) (Anamaya, New Delhi) 375–382Google Scholar
  • Pouliquen L. Y. Risk analysis in project appraisal. World Bank Staff Occasional Papers (1970) 1(John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Powell M. R., Wilson J. R. Risk assessment for national natural resource conservation programs. (1997) . Discussion Paper 97-49, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Pulkkinen U., Simola K. An expert panel approach to support risk-informed decision making. (2000) . Technical Report STUK-YTO-TR 129, Sateiluturvakeskus (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland STUK), Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  • Selvidge J. E. Assessing the extremes of probability distributions by the fractile method. Decision Sci. (1980) 11:493–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sentenac D., Shalaginov A. N., Fera A., de Jue W. H. On the instrumental resolution in X-ray reflectivity experiments. J. Appl. Crystallography (2000) 33:130–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson T. On the advantage of taking the mean of a number of observations in practical astronomy, a letter to the Right Honourable George Earls of Maclesfield, President of the Royal Society. Philos. Trans. (1755) 49(1):82–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dorp J. R., Kotz S. Generalized trapezoidal distributions. Metrika (2003) 58(1):85–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner M. A. F., Wilson J. R. Graphical interactive simulation input modeling with bivariate Bézier distributions. ACM Trans. Model. and Comput. Simulation (1995) 5(3):163–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner M. A. F., Wilson J. R. Using univariate Bézier distributions to model simulation input processes. IIE Trans. (1996) 28(9):699–711CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.