Decision Analysis: The Right Tool for Auctions

References

• Capen E., Clapp R. V., Campbell W. M. Competitive bidding in high risk situations. J. Petroleum Tech. (1971) 23:641–651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu H., Raghunathan S. Configuration software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. (2004) 1:131–148Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke E. H. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice (1971) 11:17–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edgeworth F. Y.Mathematical Psychics (1881) (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) Google Scholar
• Friedman L. A competitive bidding strategy. Oper. Res. (1956) 4:104–112Link, Google Scholar
• Friedman L. Competitive bidding strategies. (1957) . Ph.D. dissertation, Case Institute of Technology, Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
• Groves T. Incentives in teams. Econometrica (1973) 41:617–631Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Subjective probability and the theory of games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey's paper. Management Sci. (1982a) 28:120–124Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Rejoinder to Professors Kadane and Larkey. Management Sci. (1982b) 28:124–125Link, Google Scholar
• Harstad R. M., Rothkopf M. H., Waehrer K., Baye M. Efficiency in auctions when bidders have private information about competitors. Advances in Applied Micro-Economics (1996) 6(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–13Google Scholar
• Hohner G., Rich J., Ng E., Reid G., Davenport A. J., Kalagnanam J. R., Lee H. S., An C. Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit mars, incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces (2003) 33:23–35Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Value of information lotteries. IEEE Trans. Systems Man. Cybernetics (1967) SSC 3:54–60Google Scholar
• Kadane J. P., Larkey P. D. Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Sci. (1982a) 28:113–120Link, Google Scholar
• Kadane J. P., Larkey P. D. Reply to Professor Harsanyi. Management Sci. (1982b) 28:124Link, Google Scholar
• Kahan J. P. On choosing between Rev. Bayes and Prof. Van Neumann. Management Sci. (1983) 29:1334–1336Link, Google Scholar
• Keats J., Coffin C. M. Ode on a Grecian Urn. The Major Poets: English and American (1954) (Harcourt Brace and Company, New York) 347–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefer D. L., Smith F. B., Back H. B. Development and use of modeling system to aid a major oil company in allocating bidding capital. Oper. Res. (1991) 39:28–41Link, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P. What really matters about auction design. J. Econom. Perspectives (2002) 16:169–189[Reprinted in P. Klemperer. 2004. Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.]Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metty T., Samelson Q., Harlan R., Moore T., Morris T., Sorensen R., Schneur A., Kanner J., Potts K., Robbins J., Raskina O., Schneur R. Reinventing the supplier negotiation process at Motorola. Interfaces (2005) 35:7–23Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. A thoery of aucitons and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50:1089–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. R. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6:58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Oren S. S., Rothkopf M. H. Optimal bidding in sequential auctions. Oper. Res. (1975) 23:1080–1090Link, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Schoumaker F. Subjective probability and the theory of games: Some further comments. Management Sci. (1983) 29:1337–1340Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H. Modeling semirational competitive behavior. Management Sci. (1983) 29:1341–1345Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H. Thirteen reasons the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves process is not practical. Oper. Res. (2007) 55:191–197Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Harstad R. M. Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay. Management Sci. (1994) 40:364–384Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Harstad R. M. Two models of bid-taker cheating in Vickrey auctions. J. Bus. (1995) 68:257–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Park S. An elementary introduction to auctions. Interfaces (2001) 31:83–97Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Teisberg T. J., Kahn E. P. Why are Vickrey auctions rare? J. Political Econom. (1990) 98:94–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandholm T., Levine D., Concordia M., Hughes R., Jacobs J., Begg D. Changing the game in strategic sourcing at Procter & Gamble: Expressive competition enabled by optimization. Interfaces (2006) 36:55–68Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith C. W.Auctions: The Social Construction of Value (1990) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• van Binsbergen J. H., Marx L. M. Exploring relations between decision analysis and game theory. Decision Anal. (2007) 4:34–40Link, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 41:8–37Crossref, Google Scholar