Eliciting Subjective Probabilities Through Exchangeable Events: An Advantage and a Limitation

References

• Abbas A., Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T., Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability wheel vs. fixed variable values. (2007) . Working paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Baillon A., Wakker P. P. Combining Bayesian beliefs and willingness to bet to analyze attitudes towards uncertainty. (2008) . Working paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Baillon A., Placedo L., Wakker P. P. The rich domain of uncertainty. (2008) . Working paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Ariely D., Au W. T., Bender R. H., Budescu D. V., Dietz C. B., Gu H., Wallsten T. S., Zauberman G. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (2000) 6:130–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D., Abbas A., Wu L. Does probability weighting matter in probability elicitation? (2008) . Working paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
• Chesley G. R. Subjective probability elicitation techniques: A performance comparison. J. Accounting Res. (1978) 16:225–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., Sagi J. Event exchangeability: Probabilistic sophistication without continuity or monotonicity. Econometrica (2006) 74:771–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Finetti B. La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l'I.H.P. (1937) 7:1–68Google Scholar
• de Finetti B., Staël von Holstein C.-A. S. The value of studying subjective evaluations of probability. The Concept of Probability in Psychological Experiments (1974) (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland) 2–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan P., Jones M. Explaining attitudes towards ambiguity: An experimental test of the comparative ignorance hypothesis. Scottish J. Political Econom. (2004) 51:281–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drèze J. H.Essays on Economic Decision Under Uncertainty (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92:433–461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Decision making under ambiguity. J. Bus. (1986) 59:S225–S250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75:643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner W. Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75:670–689Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1978) 4:330–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Rogers B. A., Tversky A. Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty (1996) 13:5–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., See K. E., Hardman D., Macchi L. Belief and preference in decision under uncertainty. Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making (2003) (Wiley, New York) 273–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Tversky A. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1998) 44:879–895Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison G. W. An experimental test for risk aversion. Econom. Lett. (1986) 21:7–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Tversky A. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1991) 4:5–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Sci. (1990) 36:780–803Link, Google Scholar
• Humphrey S. J. Regret aversion or event-splitting effects? More evidence under risk and uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1995) 11:263–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Hershey J. C., Meszaros J., Kunreuther H. C. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 7:35–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadane J. B., Winkler R. L. Separating probability elicitation from utilities. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. (1988) 83:357–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E. Bayesian decision theory and the representation of beliefs. (2007) . Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
• Karni E. A theory of Bayesian decision making. (2008) . Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
• Kilka M., Weber M. What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1712–1726Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H., Winkler R. L. Scoring rules in probability assessment and evaluation. Acta Psychologica (1970) 34:917–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offerman T., Sonnemans J., van de Kuilen G., Wakker P. P. A truth-serum for non-Bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. (2007) . Working paper, CREED, University of Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Raiffa H.Decision Analysis (1968) (Addison-Wesley, London) Google Scholar
• Ramsey F. P., Braithwaite R. B. Truth and probability (1926). The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (1931) (Routledge, London) 156–198Google Scholar
• Redelmeier D. A., Koehler D. J., Liberman V., Tversky A. Probability judgment in medicine: Discounting unspecified possibilities. Medical Decision Making (1995) 15:227–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Spetzler C. S., Stael Von Holstein C.-A. S. Probability encoding in decision analysis. Management Sci. (1975) 22:340–358Link, Google Scholar
• Starmer C., Sugden R. Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 6:235–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Fox C. R. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102:269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psych. Rev. (1983) 90:293–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101:547–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Wakker P. P. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica (1995) 63:1255–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V., Zwick R. Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgments. Management Sci. (1993) 39:176–190Link, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1969) 64:1073–1078Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright W. F. Empirical comparison of subjective probability elicitation methods. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1988) 5:47–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zegers F. E. A family of chance-corrected association coefficients for metric scales. Psychometrika (1986) 51:559–569Crossref, Google Scholar