Aggregating Probabilistic Forecasts from Incoherent and Abstaining Experts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1080.0119

References

  • Alpert M., Raiffa H., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 294–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batsell R., Brenner L., Osherson D., Tsavachidis S., Vardi M. Y. Eliminating incoherence from subjective estimates of chance. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002) (2002) Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Bregman L. M. The relaxation method of finding a common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming. U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phy. (1967) 78(384):200–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brier G. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. (1950) 78:1–3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Censor Y., Zenios S. A.Parallel Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Winkler R. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. (1999) 19:187–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Internat. J. Forecasting (1989) 5:559–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalkey N. C., Helmer O. An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Management Sci. (1963) 9:458–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Finetti B.Theory of Probability (1974) 1(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dykstra R. L. An algorithm for restricted least squares regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1983) 78(384):837–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gärdenfors P.Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Genest C., Zidek J. Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography. Statist. Sci. (1986) 1(1):114–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansson S. O.A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendrix M. E., Hartley P. R., Osherson D. Real estate values and air pollution: Measured levels and subjective expectations. (2005) . Working paper, Rice University, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M. Decision making and change in human affairs. Methods for Aggregating Opinions (1977) (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland) 231–256Google Scholar
  • Homer S., Selman A. L.Computability and Complexity Theory (2001) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A.Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindley D. V., Tversky A., Brown R. V. On the reconciliation of probability assessments. J. Royal Statist. Soc. A (1979) 142(Part 2):146–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorge I., Fox D., Davitz J., Brenner M. A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance. Psych. Bull. (1958) 55:337–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan M. G., Henrion M.Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osherson D., Vardi M. Y. Aggregating disparate estimates of chance. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 56(1):148–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (1988) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Predd J., Seiringer R., Lieb E. H., Osherson D., Poor V., Kulkarni S. Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules. (2007) . Available at: http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:0710.3183Google Scholar
  • Shafer G.A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (1976) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sniezek J. A., Henry R. A. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989) 43:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tentori K., Bonini N., Osherson D. The conjunction fallacy: A misunderstanding about conjunction? Cognitive Sci. (2004) 28(3):467–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weisstein E. W. Multiset. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. (2006) . Retrieved October 10, 2007, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multiset.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J. F.Judgment and Decision Making (1990) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.