An Interactive Search Method Based on User Preferences

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1080.0125

References

  • Corner J. L., Corner P. D. Characteristics of decisions in decision analysis practice. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1995) 46(3):304–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corner J. L., Kirkwood C. W. Decision analysis applications in the operations research literature, 1970–1989. Oper. Res. (1991) 39(2):206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards W. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man Cybernetics SMC-7 (1977) 326–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardiner L. R., Steuer R. E. Unified interactive multiple objective programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 74(3):391–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Dyer J. S., Feinberg A. An interactive approach for multicriterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Sci. (1972) 19(4):357–368LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W., Sarin R. K. Preference conditions for multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(1):225–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Köksalan M. M., Sagala P. N. S. Interactive approaches for discrete alternative multiple criteria decision making with monotone utility functions. Management Sci. (1995) 41(7):1158–1171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P. A visual reference direction approach to solving discrete multiple criteria problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1988) 34(2):152–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Laakso J. A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1986) 24(2):277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Moskowitz H., Wallenius J. Choice behavior in interactive multiple criteria decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. (1990) 23:161–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddulapalli A. K., Azarm S., Boyars A. Sensitivity analysis for product design selection with an implicit value function. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 180(3):1245–1259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miettinen K.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (2004) (Kluwer, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Rocchio J. J., Salton G. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing (1971) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 313–323Google Scholar
  • Roy A., Wallenius J. Nonlinear and unconstrained multiple-objective optimization: Algorithm, computation and application. Naval Res. Logist. (1991) 38:623–635CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy A., Wallenius J. Nonlinear multiple objective optimization: An algorithm and some theory. Math. Programming (1992) 55:235–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salton G., Buckley C. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1990) 41:288–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen X., Zhai C. Active feedback in ad hoc information retrieval. Proc. 28th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (2005) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin W. S., Ravindran A. Interactive multiple objective optimization, survey I—Continuous case. Comput. Oper. Res. (1991) 18(1):97–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. An interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure. TIMS Stud. Management Sci. (1977) 6:225–239Google Scholar
  • Stillwell W. G., Seaver D. A., Edwards W. A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1981) 28:62–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takagi H. Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proc. IEEE (2001) 89(9):1275–1296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vinay V., Wood K., Milic-Frayling N., Cox I. Comparing relevance feedback algorithms for web search. Special Interest Tracks and Posters of the 14th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (2005) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zionts S. A multiple criteria method for choosing among discrete alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1981) 8:143–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zionts S., Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Sci. (1976) 22(6):652–663LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zionts S., Wallenius J. An interactive MOLP method for a class of underlying nonlinear utility functions. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):519–529LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.