A Comparison of Two Probability Encoding Methods: Fixed Probability vs. Fixed Variable Values

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1080.0126

References

  • Abbas A. E., Williams C. Entropy methods for univariate distributions in decision analysis. Proc. 22nd Internat. Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods Sci. Engrg. (2002) (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY) 339–349Google Scholar
  • Abbas A. E. Entropy methods for joint distributions in decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53:146–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • AbouRizk S. M., Halpin D. W., Wilson J. R. Visual interactive fitting of beta distributions. J. Construction Engrg. Management (1992) 117:589–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alpert M., Raiffa H., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 294–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Budescu D. V., Du N. The coherence and consistency of investors' probability judgments. Management Sci. (2007) 53(11):1731–1744LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carpen E. C., Clapp E. V., Campbell W. Competitive bidding in high risk situations. J. Petroleum Tech. (1971) 23:641–653CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duran B. S., Booker J. M. A Bayes sensitivity analysis when using the beta distribution as a prior. IEEE Trans. Reliability (1988) 37:239–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards W., von Winterfeldt D. Public values in risk debates. Risk Anal. (1987) 7:141–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felli J., Hazen G. Javelin diagrams: A graphical tool for probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):93–107LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fox B. L. A Bayesian approach to reliability assessment. (1966) . Memorandum RM-5084-NASA, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Gates H. Bidding strategies and probabilities. J. Construction Division, ASCE, Paper 5159 (1967) 93:75–107Google Scholar
  • Gilless J. K., Fried J. S. Generating Beta random rate variables from probabilistic estimates of fireline production times. Ann. Oper. Res. (2000) 95:205–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gross A. J. The application of exponential smoothing to reliability assessment. Technometrics (1971) 13:877–883CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hora S. C., Hora J. A., Dodd N. G. Assessment of probability distribution for continuous random variables: A comparison of bisection and fixed value methods. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1992) 51:135–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. The evolution of decision analysis. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1983) (Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) 5–16Google Scholar
  • Howard R. A. Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. (1988) 34(6):679–695LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes G., Madden L. V. Some methods for eliciting expert knowledge of plant disease epidemics and their application in cluster sampling for disease incidence. Crop Protection (2002) 21:203–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juslin P., Wennerholm P., Olsson H. Format-dependence in subjective probability calibration. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1999) 25:1038–1052CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer D. L., Bodily S. E. Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):595–609LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klayman J., Soll J., Gonzalez-Vallejo C., Barlas S. Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79:216–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S., van Dorp J. R.Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families of Distributions with Bounded Support and Applications (2004) (World Scienific Press, Singapore) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lau A. H. L., Lau H. S., Zhang Y. A simple and logical alternative for making PERT time estimates. IIE Trans. (1996) 28:183–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • León C. J., Vázquez-Polo F. J., González R. L. Elicitation of expert opinion in benefit of environmental goods. Environ. Resource Econom. (2003) 26:199–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenstein S., Fichhoff B., Phillips L. D., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 306–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindley D. V. Using expert advice on a skew judgmental distribution. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(5):716–721LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McNamee P., Celona J.Decision Analysis for the Professional (2001) 3rd ed.(SmartOrg Inc., Menlo Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Merkhofer M. W. Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1987) 17:741–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moder J. J., Rodgers E. G. Judgment estimate of the moments of PERT type distributions. Management Sci. (1968) 18(2):76–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Hagan A., Buck C. E., Daneshkhah A., Eiser J. R., Garthwaite P. H., Jenkinson D. J., Oakley J. E., Rakow T.Uncertain Judgments: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities (2006) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry C., Greig I. D. Estimating the mean and variance of subjective distributions in PERT and decision analysis. Management Sci. (1975) 21(12):1477–1480LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raiffa H., Schlaifer R.Applied Statistical Decision Theory (1961) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Russo J. E., Schoemaker P. J. H. Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33:7–17Google Scholar
  • Smith J. E. Moment methods for decision analysis. Management Sci. (1993) 39(3):340–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soll J. B., Klayman J. Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2004) 30:299–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spetzler C. S., von Holstein C.-A. S. S. Probability encoding in decision analysis. Management Sci. (1975) 22(3):340–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dorp J. R., Mazzuchi T. A. Solving for the parameters of a Beta distribution under two quantile constraints. J. Statist. Comput. Simulation (2000) 67:189–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dorp J. R., Rambaud S., Prez J., Pleguezuelo R. H. An elicitation procedure for the generalized trapezoidal distribution with a uniform central stage. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):156–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V. Encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review. Management Sci. (1983) 29(2):151–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wallsten T. S., Forsyth B., Budescu D. V. Stability and coherence of health experts' upper and lower subjective probabilities about dose-response curves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1983) 31:277–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson S. R., Buede D. M.Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Weiler H. The use of incomplete Beta functions for prior distributions in binomial sampling. Technometrics (1965) 7:335–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.