Anchor Selection and Group Dynamics in Newsvendor Decisions—A Note

References

• Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bendoly E., Donohue K., Schultz K. L. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):737–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benzion U., Cohen Y., Peled R., Shavit T. Decision-making and the newsvendor problem—An experimental study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2008) 59(9):1281–1287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G. E., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):519–538Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton G. E., Katok E., Ockenfels A. How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1587–1602Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau J., Hopp W., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Brewer N. T., Chapman G. B. The fragile basic anchoring effect. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2002) 15(1):65–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cervone D., Peake P. K. Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1986) 50(3):492–501Google Scholar
• Cioffi J. Heuristics, servants to intuition, in clinical decision-making. J. Advanced Nursing (1997) 26(1):203–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett C. J., Fransoo J. C. Entrepreneurs and newsvendors: Do small businesses follow the newsvendor logic when making inventory decisions? (2007) . Working paper, Anderson School, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Croson R., Donohue K. Experimental economics and supply chain management. Interfaces (2002) 32(5):74–82Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Donohue K. Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Donohue K. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):323–336Link, Google Scholar
• Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A.Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Erlenkotter D. Ford Whitman Harris and the economic order quantity model. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(6):937–946Link, Google Scholar
• Gavirneni S., Xia Y. Anchor selection and group dynamics in newsvendor decision making: Observations from an experimental study. (2008) . Working paper, Johnson School, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
• George J. F., Duffy K., Ahuja M. Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems. Decision Support Systems (2000) 29(2):195–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond J. H., Raman A. (2006) . Sport Obermeyer, Ltd., HBS Case 9-695-022, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Hastie R., Crofman B., Owen G. Experimental evidence on group accuracy. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 129–157Google Scholar
• Joyce E., Biddle G. Are auditors' judgments sufficiently regressive? J. Accounting Res. (1981) 19(2):323–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie N. H., Swaminathan J. M. Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 108(2):315–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T., Strack F. The semantics of anchoring. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86(2):234–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1987) 39(1):84–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porteus E. L.Foundations of Stochastic Inventory Theory (2002) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson E. P., Swink M. L. A comparative model of facility network design and methodologies. J. Oper. Management (1995) 13(3):169–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt J. B., Montoya-Weis M., Massey A. P. New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(4):575–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz K. L., McClain J., Thomas L. J. Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility. J. Oper. Management (2003) 21(1):81–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz K. L., Juran D., Boudreau J., McClain J., Thomas L. J. Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1597–1607Google Scholar
• Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Silver E. A. Process management instead of operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(4):273–279Link, Google Scholar
• Sniezek J. A. Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 52(1):124–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sniezek J. A., Henry R. A. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989) 43(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D., Shi M. Virtual progress: The effect of path characteristics on perceptions of progress and choice. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1229–1250Link, Google Scholar
• Steckel J. H., Gupta S., Banerji A. Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):458–464Link, Google Scholar
• Switzer F. S., Sniezek J. A. Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1991) 49(1):208–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwari V., Gavirneni S. Re-coupling inventory control research and practice—Guidelines for achieving synergy. Interfaces (2007) 37(2):176–186Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner H. M. And then there were none. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(1):217–226Link, Google Scholar
• Whyte G., Sebenius J. K. The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(1):75–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu D. Y., Katok E. Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):839–850Crossref, Google Scholar