From the Editor…

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1090.0137

References

  • Abbas A. E. Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Howard R. A. Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):185–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T., Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel J. E. Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley R. F. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown R. Naming concepts worth naming: (Comment on Howard 2004). Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):86–88LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown R. V. Working with policy makers on their choices: A decision analyst reminisces. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):14–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T. To Bayes or not to Bayes? A comparison of two classes of models of information aggregation. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(3):145–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C. Decision theory: The next 100 years. Econom. J. (1991) 101(January):27–32Google Scholar
  • French S., Rios Insua D., Ruggeri F. e-Participation and decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):211–226LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R., Fischhoff B., McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffmann S., Fischbeck P., Krupnick A., McWilliams M. Elicitation from large, heterogeneous expert panels: Using multiple uncertainty measures to characterize information quality for decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):91–109LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A. Speaking of decisions: Precise decision language. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):71–78LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnstone D. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer D. L., Kirkwood C. W., Corner J. L. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):4–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilgour D. M., Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes L. L., Bromley D. W., Segerson K. Risk perception and the perceived public. The Social Response to Environmental Risk: Policy Formulation in an Age of Uncertainty (1992) (Springer, New York) 57–74Chap. 3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle K. F., Rajaram K., Tang C. S. A decision analysis tool for evaluating fundraising tiers. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):4–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Predd J. B., Osherson D. N., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V. Aggregating probabilistic forecasts from incoherent and abstaining experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):177–189LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.