Development of a Green Building Decision Support Tool: A Collaborative Process

References

• Balson W. E., Welsh J. L., Wilson D. S. Using decision analysis and risk analysis to manage utility environmental risk. Interfaces (1992) 22(6):126–139Link, Google Scholar
• Beccali M., Cellura M., Mistretta M. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy (2003) 28(13):2063–2087Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borison A. Oglethorpe Power Corporation decides about investing in a major transmission system. Interfaces (1995) 25(2):25–36Link, Google Scholar
• Caccavelli D., Guergli H. TOBUS—A European diagnosis and decision-making tool for office building upgrading. Energy Buildings (2002) 34:113–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools (2001) (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Dunning D. J., Lockfort S., Ross Q. E., Beccue P. C., Stonebraker J. S. New York Power Authority uses decision analysis to schedule refueling of its Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant. Interfaces (2001) 31(5):121–135Link, Google Scholar
• Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93Link, Google Scholar
• Frederick K. D., VandenBerg T., Hanson J. Economic values of freshwater in the United States. (1996) . Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Georgopoulou E., Lalas D., Papagiannakis L. A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: The case of the renewable energy option. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103(1):38–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgopoulou E., Sarafidis Y., Mirasgedis S., Zaimi S., Lalas D. P. A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 146(1):199–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory R., Fischhoff B., McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16Link, Google Scholar
• Guikema S., Milke M. Quantitative decision tools for conservation programme planning: Practice, theory, and potential. Environ. Conservation (1999) 26:179–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen H. S. GIS-based multi-criteria analysis of wind farm development. (2005) . Report, National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
• Haralambopoulos D. A., Polatidis H. Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision making framework. Renewable Energy (2003) 28(6):961–973Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R., Abbas A.The Foundations of Decision Analysis (2010) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Walser M. L., Nodvin S. C. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. (2008) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Jackson J. A., Kloeber J. M., Ralston B. E., Deckro R. F. Selecting a portfolio of technologies: An application of decision analysis. Decisions Sci. (1999) 30(1):217–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasemir B., Schibl D., Stoll S., Jaeger C. C. Involving the public in climate and energy decisions. Environment. (2000) 42(3):32–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefer D. L. Facilities evaluation under uncertainty: Pricing a refinery. Interfaces (1995) 25(6):57–66Link, Google Scholar
• Keefer D. L., Kirkwood C. W., Corner J. L. Perspective on DA applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):4–22Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R., McDaniels T. L. Value focused thinking about strategic decisions at BC Hydro. Interfaces (1992) 22(6):94–109Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klimack W. K., Kloeber J. M. Multiobjective value analysis of army basic training. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):50–58Link, Google Scholar
• Leach M., Bauen A., Lucas N. A systems approach to materials flow in sustainable cities: A case study of paper. J. Environ. Plan Management (1997) 40(6):705–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lomborg B.Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming (2007) (Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
• McDaniels T. L., Roessler C. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: A constructive approach. Ecological Econom. (1998) 27:299–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkhofer M. W.Decision Science and Social Risk Management (1987) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multi-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57Link, Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration economics: discounting and time preference. (2008) . Accessed June 4, http://www.csc.noaa.gov/coastal/economics/discounting.htmGoogle Scholar
• National Research CouncilValuing Health Risks, Costs, and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making (1990) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Nicklas M., Bailey G.Energy Performance of Daylit Schools in North Carolina (1996) (Innovative Design, Raleigh, NC) Google Scholar
• Phillips L. D., Costa C. A. B. e. Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann. Oper. Res. (2007) 154:51–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Rosado I. J., Garcia-Garrido E., Fernandez-Jiminez L. A., Zorzano-Santamaria P. J., Monteiro C., Miranda V. Promotion of new wind farms based on a decision support system. Renewable Energy (2008) 33(4):558–566Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. S., Oeser N., Schaub C. How effective are decision analyses? Assessing process and group alignment effects. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):227–242Link, Google Scholar
• Sheppard S. D., Macatangay K., Colby A., Sullivan W. M.Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field (2009) (The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Solarbuzz Portal to the world of solar energy. (2008) . Accessed May 15, http://www.solarbuzz.com/Google Scholar
• Tol R. S. J. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy (2005) 33:2064–2074Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topcu Y. I., Ulengin F. Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid case in Turkey. Energy (2004) 29(1):137–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency eGRID2006 v2.1. (2007) (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC) . http://www.epa.gov/RDEE/energy-resources/egrid/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Wang Q. W., Santini D. J. Monetary values of air pollutant emissions in various US regions. Transportation Res. Record (1995) 1475:33–41Google Scholar
• Winterfeldt D. v., O'Sullivan T. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75Link, Google Scholar