Supporting Negotiations over Influence Diagrams

References

• Anant T. C. A., Basu K., Mukherji B. Bargaining without convexity: Generalizing the Kalai–Smorodinsky solution. Econom. Lett. (1990) 33:115–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacharach M. Group decisions in the face of differences of opinion. Management Sci. (1975) 22(2):182–191Link, Google Scholar
• Brown P. C. Influence diagrams to model and classify game theoretic problems. 11th Internat. Conf. Game Theory (2000) Stony Brook, NYGoogle Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools (2001) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Conley J. P., Wilkie S. The bargaining problem without convexity: Extending the egalitarian and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions. Econom. Lett. (1991) 36(4):365–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detwarasiti A., Shachter R. D. Influence diagrams for team decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):207–228Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher R.International Mediation: A Working Guide (1978) (International Peace Academy, New York) Google Scholar
• French S., Rios Insua D.Statistical Decision Theory (2000) (Arnold, London) Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1984) II(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) 719–762Google Scholar
• Hylland A., Zeckhauser R. The impossibility of Bayesian group decision making with separate aggregation of beliefs and values. Econometrica (1979) 47(6):1321–1336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jelassi T., Foroughi A. Negotiation support systems: An overview of design issues and existing software. Decision Support Systems (1989) 5:167–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen F. V., Nielsen T. D.Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (2007) (Springer Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen F., Jensen F. V., Dittmer S. L., Lopez de Mantaras R., Poole D. From influence diagrams to junction trees. Proc. 10th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1994) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 367–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadane J. B. Several Bayesians: A review. Test (1993) 2(1):1–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E., Smorodinski M. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica (1975) 43(3):513–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearns M., Littman M. L., Singh S. Graphical models for game theory. Proc. 17th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2001) (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA) 253–260Google Scholar
• Kersten G. E.Negotiations and E-Negotiations: Analysis, Management and Support (2009) (Springer, New York) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Koller D., Milch B. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games Econom. Behav. (2003) 45(1):181–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korhonen P., Oretskin N., Teich J., Wallenius J. The impact of a biased starting position in a single negotiation text type mediation. Group Decision Negotiation (1995) 4(4):357–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaMura P. Game networks. Proc. 16th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2000) (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA) 335–342Google Scholar
• Larsson A., Idefeldt J., Ao S. I., Lee J.-A., Castillo O., Chaudhuri P., Feng D. D. Representation and evaluation of influence diagrams in a common framework for interval decision analysis. Proc. 2006 Internat. Multiconference of Engineers Comput. Scientists (2006) (Newswood Limited, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong) 738–743Google Scholar
• Nash J. F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18:155–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash J. F. Noncooperative games. Ann. Math. (1951) 54:289–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H. Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. Annals of Mathematics Studies (1953) 28(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 361–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty (1968) (Addison-Wesley, MA) Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.Negotiation Analysis (2002) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Rios J., Rios Insua D. A framework for participatory budget elaboration support. J. Oper. Res. Society (2008) 59(2):203–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios J., Rios Insua D. Balanced increment and concession methods for negotiation support. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. (RACSAM) (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Rios Insua D., Holgado J., Moreno R. An e-negotiation system to support e-democracy. J. Multicriteria Decision Anal. (2004) 12:213–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D., E Kersten G., Rios J., Grima C., Burstein F., Holsapple C. W. Towards decision support for participatory democracy. Handbook of Decision Support Systems (2008) II(Springer, Berlin) 1483–1517Chap. 66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sebenius J. K. Negotiation analysis: A characterization and review. Management Sci. (1992) 38(1):18–38Link, Google Scholar
• Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B., Schervish M. J. On the shared preferences of two Bayesian decision makers. J. Philosophy (1989) 86(5):225–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1986) 34(6):871–882Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D. Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(4):589–604Link, Google Scholar
• Thomson W., Aumann R. J., Hart S. Cooperative models of bargaining. Handbook of Game Theory (1994) II(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1238–1277Chap. 35Google Scholar
• Vickrey D., Koller D. Multi-agent algorithms for solving graphical games. Proc. 18th Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2002) (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA) 345–351Google Scholar
• Zhang N. Probabilistic inference in influence diagrams. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1998) (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA) 514–522Crossref, Google Scholar