Procurement Auctions for Differentiated Goods

References

• Bulow J., Roberts J. The simple economics of optimal auctions. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(5):1060–1090Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y.-K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(4):668–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y.-K., Gale I. Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):646–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K.-Y., Plott C. R. Nonlinear behavior in sealed bid first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (1998) 25(1):34–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corns A., Schotter A. Can affirmative action be cost effective? An experimental examination of price-preference auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):291–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S., Spulber D. F. Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy (1990) 4(1):5–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R., MacKinnon J. G. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica (1981) 49(3):781–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Haruvy E., Katok E. A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):629–641Link, Google Scholar
• Fullerton R. L., Linster B. G., McKee M., Slate S. Using auctions to reward tournament winners: Theory and experimental investigations. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(1):62–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georee J. K., Offereman T. Efficiency in auctions with private and common values: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(3):625–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guth W., Ivanova-Stenzel R., Wolfstetterr E. Bidding behavior in asymmetric auctions: An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2005) 49(7):1891–1913Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E., Katok E. An experimental investigation of buyer determined procurement auctions. (2008) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Isaac R. M., Salmon T. C., Zillante A. A theory of jump bidding in ascending auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 62(1):144–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):146–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney S. RIP fixed pricing: The Internet is on its way to “marketizing” everything. Bus. Econom. (2000) 35(2):39–44Google Scholar
• Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature (1987) 25(2):699–738Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Government procurement and international trade. J. Internat. Econom. (1989) 26(3–4):291–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Pezanis-Christou P. On the impact of low-balling: Experimental results in asymmetric auctions. Internat. J. Game Theory (2002) 31(1):69–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rezende L. Biased procurement auctions. Econom. Theory (2009) 38(1):169–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan G. Optimal procurement mechanisms for an informed buyer. Canadian J. Econom. (1996) 29(3):699–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickery W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar