Is Screening Cargo Containers for Smuggled Nuclear Threats Worthwhile?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0171

References

  • Apostolakis G. E., Lemon D. M. A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Anal. (2005) 25(2):361–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakir N. O. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bedford T. M., Cooke R. M.Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Method (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernado J., Smith A.Bayesian Theory (1994) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V. M., Wilson A., Limnios N., Keller-McNulty S., Armijo Y. Game-theoretic and reliability methods in counter-terrorism and security. Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Reliability, Series on Quality, Reliability and Engineering Statistics (2005) (World Scientific, Singapore) 17–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V. M., Oliveros S., Samuelson L. Choosing what to protect: Strategic defensive allocation against an unknown attacker. J. Public Econom. Theory (2007a) 9(4):563–587CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V. M., Gratz E. R., Haphuriwat N. J., Magua W., Wierzbicki K. R. Methodology for identifying near-optimal interdiction strategies for a power transmission system. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2007b) 92(9):1155–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonner R. C. (2005) . Statement of Robert C. Bonner—Hearing before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, May 26. http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=80694a1a-17c0-4d48-a105-190af6edca26Google Scholar
  • Bronskill J., Bailey S. Dirty bomb would cause panic, cost billions: Study. TheStar.com (2007) July 2). http://www.thestar.com/article/231670Google Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools Suite (2001) 1st ed.(Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • de Rugy V.Is Port Security Making Us Safer? (2005) (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Ebeling C. E. Evolution of a box. Invention Tech. (2009) 23(4):8–9Google Scholar
  • Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner F. Al-Qaeda “was making dirty bomb”. BBC News Online (2003) January 31). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2711645.stmGoogle Scholar
  • Haimes Y. Y., Kaplan S., Lambert J. H. Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(2):383–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heal G., Kunreuther H. IDS models of airline security. J. Conflict Resolution (2005) 49(2):201–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L. Modeling values for anti-terrorism analysis. Risk Anal. (2007) 27(3):585–596CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making, Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kunreuther H., Heal G. Interdependent security. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 26(2–3):231–249Google Scholar
  • Leung M., Lambert J. H., Mosenthal A. A risk-based approach to setting priorities in protecting bridges against terrorist attacks. Risk Anal. (2004) 24(4):963–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis B. M., Erera A. L., White C. C. Optimization approaches for efficient container security operations at transshipment seaports. Transportation Res. Record (2003) 1822:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madigan D., Mittal S., Roberts F. Sequential decision making algorithms for port of entry inspection: Overcoming computational challenges. Proc. 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics Conf. (2007) (IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA) 1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnell G. S., Smith C. M., Moxley D. I. Intelligent adversary risk analysis: A bioterrorism risk management model. Risk Anal. (2010) 30(1):32–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell E. Fusion of intelligence information. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(3):445–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell E., Guikema S. Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Oper. Res. (2002) 7(4):5–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramirez-Marquez J. E. Port-of-entry safety via the reliability optimization of container inspection strategy through an evolutionary approach. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2008) 93:1698–1709CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rios Insua D., Jesus J., Banks D. Adversarial risk analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2009) 104(486):841–854CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosoff H., von Winterfeldt D. A risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Risk Anal. (2007) 27(3):533–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (U.S. GAO) Combating nuclear smuggling: Challenges facing U.S. efforts to deploy radiation detection equipment in other countries and in the United States. (2006) . GAO-06-558T, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., Sullivan T. M. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J., Bier V. M. Balancing terrorism and natural disasters—Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(5):976–991LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J., Bier V. M., Gupta A. Subsidies in interdependent security with heterogeneous discount rates. Engrg. Economist (2007) 52(1):1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.