Honoring Michael H. Rothkopf's Legacy of Rigor and Relevance in Auction Theory: From the Editors

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0175

References

  • Abbas A. E. Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Hann I.-H. Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own price channel. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):123–136LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Howard R. A. Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):185–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T., Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P., Borle S., Kadane J. B. Common value vs. private value categories in online auctions: A distinction without a difference? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):86–98LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley R. F. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley R., Katok E. Call for papers—Special “Michael Rothkopf memorial” issue on auctions: Deadline: April 20, 2009. Decision Anal (2009) 6(1):51LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J., Xu L., Whinston A. Managing project failure risk through contingent contracts in procurement auctions. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):23–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P., Sujarittanonta P. Pricing rule in a clock auction. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. A direct test of risk aversion and regret in first price sealed-bid auctions. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):75–86LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerchak Y. Decision-analytic approach to knockout auctions. Decision Anal (2008) 5(1):19–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harstad R. M. Auctioning the right to choose when competition persists. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):78–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harstad R. M., Rothkopf M. H. Withdrawable bids as winner's curse insurance. Oper. Res. (1995) 43(6):983–994LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E., Leszczyc P. T. L. Popkowski. The impact of online auction duration. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):99–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman K., Menon D. A practical combinatorial clock exchange for spectrum licenses. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):58–77LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jia J., Harstad R. M., Rothkopf M. H. Information variability impacts in auctions. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):137–142LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard R. From parlor games to social science: von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the creation of game theory, 1928–1944. J. Econom. Literature (1995) 33(2):730–761Google Scholar
  • Oum Y., Oren S. S. Optimal static hedging of volumetric risk in a competitive wholesale electricity market. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):107–122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H. Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):167–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H. TREES–A decision-maker's lament. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):5[Reprinted from Rothkopf, M. H. 1980. TREES-A decision-maker's lament. Oper. Res. 28(1) 3.]LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Harstad R. M. On the role of discrete bid levels in oral auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 74(3):572–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Pekeč A., Harstad R. M. Computationally manageable combinational auctions. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1131–1147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Teisberg T. J., Kahn E. P. Why are Vickrey auctions rare? J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(1):94–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shachat J., Swarthout J. T. Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):6–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J. O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.