Cardinal Scales for Health Evaluation

References

• Aczél J.Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications (1966) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Alt F. Über die Messbarkeit des Nutzens. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (1936) 7(2. Helf):161–169Translation in J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter, H. F. Sonnenschein, eds. 1971. Preferences, Utility, and Demand. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 424–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand S., Hanson K. Disability-adjusted life years: A critical review. J. Health Econom. (1997) 16(6):685–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Wakker P., Johannesson M. Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J. Risk Uncertainty (1997) 15:107–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F. Making social trade-offs among lives, disabilities, and cost. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 9:135–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broome J. Utility. Econom. Philos. (1991a) 7:1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broome J.Weighing Goods (1991b) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Broome J. Qalys. J. Public Econom. (1993) 50:149–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broome J.Weighing Lives (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chobanian A. V., Bakris G. L., Black H. R., Cushman W. C., Green L. A., Izzo J. L., Jones D. W. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension (2003) 42:1206–1252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooter R., Rappoport P. Were the ordinalists wrong about welfare economics? J. Econom. Literature (1984) 22:507–530Google Scholar
• Debreu G., Arrow K. J., Karlin S., Suppes P. Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences (1960) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 16–26Google Scholar
• Doctor J. N., Miyamoto J. M. Deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from constant-proportional time tradeoff and risk posture conditions. J. Math. Psych. (2003) 47:557–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQoL health states. Medical Care (1997) 35:1095–1108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan P., Culyer A. J., Newhouse J. P. The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. Handbook of Health Economics (2000) 1(Elsevier Science, New York) 1724–1760Google Scholar
• Dolan P., Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Econom. J. (2008) 118:215–234Google Scholar
• Dolan P., Gudex C., Kind P., Williams A. Valuing health states: A comparisons of methods. J. Health Econom. (1996) 15:209–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Sarin R. K. Group preference aggregation rules based on strength of preference. Management Sci. (1979) 25:822–832Link, Google Scholar
• Feeny D. H., Torrance W. G., Furlong W. J., Spilker B. Health utilities index. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (1996) 2nd ed.(Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia) 239–252Google Scholar
• Fisher I. Is “utility” the most suitable term for the concept that it is used to denote? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1918) 8:335–337Google Scholar
• Furlong W., Feeny D., Torrance G. W., Goldsmith C. H., DePauw S., Zhu Z., Denton M., Boyle M. Multiplicative multi-attribute utility function for the health utilities index Mark 3 (HUI3) system: A technical report. (1998) . Working Paper 98-11, McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Hamilton, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Gafni A., Birch S., Mehrez A. Economics, health, and health economics: HYEs versus QALYs. J. Health Econom. (1993) 12:325–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gold M. R., Siegel J. E., Russell L. B., Weinstein M. C.Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: Report of the Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Green C. On the societal value of health care: What do we know about the person trade-off technique? Health Econom. (2001) 10:233–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammitt J. K. QALYs versus WTP. Risk Anal. (2002) 22:985–1001Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris J. QALYfying the value of life. J. Medical Ethics (1987) 13:117–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econom. (1955) 61:309–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1123–1139Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Utility functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. (1988) 34:645–665Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Structural prescriptive models of risk attitude. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1479–1501Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Proportional discounting of future costs and benefits. Math. Oper. Res. (1995) 20:381–399Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Proofs of results in “Value-functions for continuous-time consequences”. (1998a) . Working paper, Department of Decision and Information Sciences, University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Value-functions for continuous-time consequences. (1998b) . Working paper, Department of Decision and Information Sciences, University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Aggregation of individuals' preference intensities into social preference intensity. Soc. Choice Welfare (1999) 16:65–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M. Preferentially connected sets. (2008) . Draft, University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
• Hasman A., Østerdal L. P. Equal value of life and the Pareto principle. Econom. Philos. (2004) 20:19–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hazen G. B. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen J. L. W. V. Om konvekse funktioner og uligheder imellem middelværdier. Matematisk Tidsskrift B (1905) 49–68Google Scholar
• Jensen J. L. W. V. Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes. Acta Mathematica (1906) 30:175–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johannesson M. Quality-adjusted life-years versus healthy-years equivalents—A comment. J. Health Econom. (1995) 14:9–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johannesson M., Pliskin J. S., Weinstein M. C. A note on QALYs, time tradeoffs, and discounting. Medical Decision Making (1994) 14:188–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Kahneman D., Tversky A. Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 187–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Wakker P. P., Sarin R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart J. Econom. (1997) 112:375–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. M., Anderson J. P., Spiker B. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (1996) 2nd ed.(Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia) 309–322Google Scholar
• Kind P., Spiker B. The EuroQoL instrument: An index of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (1996) 2nd ed.(Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia) 191–202Google Scholar
• Krantz D. H., Luce R. D., Suppes P., Tversky A.Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1: Additive and Polynomial Representations (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Ubel P. A. Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. J. Public Econom. (2008) 92:1795–1810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G. The myth of the HYE. J. Health Econom. (1995) 14:1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G., McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc. Sci. Medicine (1989) 28:299–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehrez A., Gafni A. Quality adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy years equivalents. Medical Decision Making (1989) 9:142–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray C. J. L. Quantifying disability: The technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull. World Health Organ. (1994) 72:429–445Google Scholar
• Murray C. J. L., Acharya A. K. Understanding DALYs. J. Health Econom. (1997) 16:703–730Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray C. J. L., Lopez A. D.The Global Burden of Disease (1996) 1(School of Public Health and WHO, Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Miyamoto J. M., Wakker P. P., Bleichrodt H., Peters H. J. M. The zero-condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Sci. (1998) 44:839–849Link, Google Scholar
• Nord E. The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs. Medical Decision Making (1995) 15:201–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nord E. The desirability of a condition versus the well-being and worth of a person. Health Econom. (2001) 10:579–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Østerdal L. P. Axioms for health care resource allocation. J. Health Econom. (2005) 24:679–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Østerdal L. P. The lack of theoretical support for using person trade-offs in QALY-type models. Eur. J. Health Econom. (2009) 10:429–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pareto V., Lausanne F. R. Cours d'é conomie politique. Oeuvres Completes (1896) INo. 26. Librairie Droz, Geneva, 1964Google Scholar
• Pfanzagl J.Theory of Measurement (1968) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Pliskin J. S., Shepard D. S., Weinstein M. C. Utility functions for life years and health status. Oper. Res. (1980) 28:206–224Link, Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Cost utility analysis: What should be measured? Soc. Sci. Medicine (1994) 39:7–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson J., Hawthorne G., Day N. A. A comparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann. Medicine (2001) 33:358–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott D. Measurement models and linear inequalities. J. Math. Psych. (1964) 1:233–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer P., McKie J., Kuhse H., Richardson J. Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation. J. Medical Ethics (1995) 21:144–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrance G. W. Health status index models: A unified mathematical view. Management Sci. (1976) 22:990–1001Link, Google Scholar
• Torrance G. W. Measurements of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J. Health Econom. (1986) 5:1–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrance G. W., Boyle M. H., Horwood S. P. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper. Res. (1982) 30:1043–1069Link, Google Scholar
• Torrance G. W., Furlong W. J., Feeny D. H., Boyle M. H. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health utilities index. PharmacoEconomics (1995) 7:503–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrance G. W., Feeny D. H., Furlong W. J., Barr R. D., Zhang Y., Wang Q. Multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health utilities index mark 2. Medical Care (1996) 34:702–722Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Williams A.Being Reasonable about the Economics of Health (1997) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar