Scoring Rules and Decision Analysis Education

References

• Bernardo J. M., Smith A. F. M.Bayesian Theory (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Some comparisons between quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Experiential learning and strictly proper scoring rules. ASEE Annual Conf.: Paper AC 2009-2249 (2009) June 17Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• Cover T. M., Thomas J. A.Elements of Information Theory (1991) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawid A. P. The well-calibrated Bayesian. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1982) 77(379):605–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot M. H., Fienberg S. E., Gupta S. S., Berger J. O. Assessing probability assessors: Calibration and refinement. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics III (1982) (Academic Press, New York) 291–314Google Scholar
• Epstein E. S. A scoring system for probability forecasts of ranked categories. J. Appl. Meteorology (1969) 8(6):985–987Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jose V. R. R., Nau R. F., Winkler R. L. Sensitivity to distance and baseline distributions in forecast evaluation. Management Sci. (2009) 55(4):582–590Link, Google Scholar
• Kerridge D. F. Inaccuracy and inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1961) 23(1):184–194Google Scholar
• Kullback S., Leibler R. A. On information sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. (1951) 22(1):79–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl K. C., Winkler R. L. Probability elicitation, scoring rules, and competition among forecasters. Management Sci. (2007) 53(11):1745–1755Link, Google Scholar
• Lindley D. V., Tiago de Oliveira J., Epstein B. The Bayesian approach to statistics. Some Recent Advances in Statistics (1982) (Academic Press, New York) 65–87Google Scholar
• Roberts H. V. Probabilistic prediction. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1965) 60(309):50–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roby T. B. Belief states: A preliminary empirical study. Behavioral Sci. (1965) 10(3):255–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. (1948) 37(3):379–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shuford E. H., Albert A., Massengill H. E. Admissible probability measurement procedures. Psychometrika (1966) 31(2):125–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staël von Holstein C.-A. S. A family of strictly proper scoring rules which are sensitive to distance. J. Appl. Meteorology (1970) 9(3):360–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toda M. Measurement of subjective probability distributions. (1963) . Report ESD-TDR-63-407, Decision Sciences Laboratory, Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, L. G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
• Winkler R. L. “Good” probability assessors. J. Appl. Meteorology (1968) 7(5):751–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1969) 64(327):1073–1078Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test (1996) 5(1):1–60Crossref, Google Scholar