Eliciting Patients' Revealed Preferences: An Inverse Markov Decision Process Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0185

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Orlin J. B. Inverse optimization. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(5):771–783LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alagoz O., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Roberts M. S. The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1420–1430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alagoz O., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Roberts M. S. Choosing among living donor and cadaveric livers. Management Sci. (2007a) 53(11):1702–1715LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alagoz O., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Roberts M. S. Determining the acceptance of cadaveric livers using an implicit model of the waiting list. Oper. Res. (2007b) 55(1):24–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alagoz O., Bryce C. L., Shechter S. M., Schaefer A. J., Chang C. H., Angus D. C., Roberts M. S. Incorporating biological natural history in simulation models: Empiric estimates of the progression of end-stage liver disease. Medical Decision Making (2005) 25(6):620–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold D., Girling A., Stevens A., Lilford R. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: Review and empirical analysis. British Medical J. (2009) 339 http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul20_3/b2688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellman R.Dynamic Programming (1957) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Wakker P., Johannesson M. Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J. Risk Uncertainty (1997) 15(2):107–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton D., Toint Ph. L. On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem. Math. Programming (1992) 53(1–3):45–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Loewenstein G., Rabin M.Advances in Behavioral Economics (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carr S., Lovejoy W. The inverse newsvendor problem: Choosing an optimal demand portfolio for capacitated resources. Management Sci. (2000) 46(7):912–927LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Culyer A. J. The normative economics of health care finance and provision. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (1989) 5(1):34–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Epenoux F. A probabilistic production and inventory problem. Management Sci. (1963) 10(1):98–108LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dial R. B. Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part I: A fast algorithm for the single-origin case. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological (1999) 33(3):189–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drummond M. F., Sculpher M. J., Torrance G. W., O'Brien B., Stoddart G. L.Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Garber A. M., Phelps C. E. Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Health Econom. (1997) 16(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gold M. R., Siegel J. E., Russell L. B., Weinstein M. C.Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Heuberger C. Inverse combinatorial optimization: A survey on problems, methods, and results. J. Combin. Optim. (2004) 8(3):329–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Risk sensitive Markov decision processes. Management Sci. (1972) 18(7):356–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaquette S. C. A utility criterion for Markov decision processes. Management Sci. (1976) 23(1):43–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porteus E. L. On the optimality of structured policies in countable stage decision processes. Management Sci. (1975) 22(2):148–157LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Puterman L. M.Markov Decision Processes (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts M. S., Angus D. C., Bryce C. L., Valenta Z., Weissfeld L. Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database. Liver Transplantation (2004) 10(7):886–897CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosser R., Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: Is there a social consensus? Internat. J. Epidemiology (1978) 7(4):347–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. A. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica (1938) 5(17):61–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. A. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica (1948) 15(60):243–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandikci B., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Alagoz O., Roberts M. S. Estimating the patient's price of privacy in liver transplantation. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(6):1393–1410LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tarantola A.Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation (1987) (Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
  • Torrance G. W. Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (1976) 10(3):129–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torrance G. W., Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Internat. J. Tech. Assessment Health Care (1989) 5(4):559–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torrance G. W., Thomas W. H., Sackett D. L. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Res. (1972) 7(3):118–133Google Scholar
  • von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Vrecko D., Klos A., Langer T. Impact of presentation format and self-reported risk aversion on revealed skewness preferences. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):57–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein M., Fineberg H. C.Clinical Decision Analysis (1980) (W. B. Saunder, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.