From the Editor…

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0187

References

  • Abbas A. E. Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Hann I.-H. Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own-price channel. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):123–136LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E., Howard R. A. Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):185–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bana e Costa C. A., Lourenço J. C., Chagas M. P., Bana e Costa J. C. Development of reusable bid evaluation models for the Portuguese Electric Transmission Company. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):22–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M., Rata C. A survey study of factors influencing risk-taking behavior in real-world decisions under uncertainty. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(3):163–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel J. E. Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):233–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bond S. D., Carlson K. A., Keeney R. L. Improving the generation of decision objectives. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):238–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brothers A. J., Mattigod S. V., Strachan D. M., Beeman G. H., Kearns P. K., Papa A., Monti C. Resource-limited multiattribute value analysis of alternatives for immobilizing radioactive liquid process waste stored in Saluggia, Italy. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):98–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butler J. C., Dyer J. S., Jia J. Using attributes to predict objectives in preference models. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):100–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cantor S. B. Clinical applications in the decision analysis literature: (Comment on Keefer et al. 2004). Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):23–25LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dees R. A., Dabkowski M. F., Parnell G. S. Decision-focused transformation of additive value models to improve communication. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):172–184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delquié P. Interpretation of the risk tolerance coefficient in terms of maximum acceptable loss. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):5–9LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L. Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk-(in)dependent utilities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):302–312LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing B., Baker E. Development of a green building decision support tool: A collaborative process. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):172–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing P. L., Tarantino W., Parnell G. S. Use of decision analysis in the Army base realignment and closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):33–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal (2006) 3(2):76–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feynman M.Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman (2005) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Feynman R. P. Mr. Feynman goes to Washington. Engrg. Sci. (1987) 51(1):6–22 http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/48/2/Feynman.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Feynman R. P.Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character (1985) (W. W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Glaser M., Langer T., Weber M. On the trend recognition and forecasting ability of professional traders. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):176–193AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey C. M., Østerdal L. P. Cardinal scales for health evaluation. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):256–281LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen G. B. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen G. B. Adding extrinsic goals to the quality-adjusted life year model. Decision Anal (2007) 4(1):3–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L. Risk independence and multiattribute utility function. Econometrica (1973) 41(1):27–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L. Communicating about decisions: (Comment on Howard 2004). Decision Anal. (2004a) 1(2):82–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L. Making better decision makers. Decision Anal. (2004b) 1(4):193–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Vernik D. A. Analysis of the biological clock decision. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):114–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W. Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):51–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mosler K. C. Stochastic dominance decision rules when the attributes are utility independent. Management Sci. (1984) 30(11):1311–1322LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Müller P., Berry D. A., Grieve A. P., Krams M. A Bayesian decision-theoretic dose-finding trial. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):197–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nosić A., Weber M. How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):282–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sandvik B., Thorlund-Petersen L. Sensitivity analysis of risk tolerance. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):313–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. S., Oeser N., Schaub C. How effective are decision analyses? Assessing decision process and group alignment effects. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):227–242LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. E. Risk sharing, fiduciary duty, and corporate risk attitudes. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):114–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsetlin I., Winkler R. L. On equivalent target-oriented formulations for multiattribute utility. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):94–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vrecko D., Klos A., Langer T. Impact of presentation format and self-reported risk aversion on revealed skewness preferences. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):57–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker P. P., Jansen S. J. T., Stiggelbout A. M. Anchor levels as a new tool for the theory and measurement of multiattribute utility. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):217–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M., Zuchel H. How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):30–43LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.