From the Editors…

References

• Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37Link, Google Scholar
• Bakir N. O. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett A. M. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):233–251Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. The relationship between perfect and imperfect information in a two-action risk-sensitive problem. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):116–128Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. On the decision to take a pitch. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):186–193Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E., Smith J. E. Optimal sequential exploration: A binary learning model. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):16–32Link, Google Scholar
• Bodily S. E., Pfeifer P. E. Darden's luckiest student: Lessons from a high-stakes risk experiment. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):331–345Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor S. B. Clinical applications in the decision analysis literature (Comment on Keefer et al. 2004). Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):23–25Link, Google Scholar
• Delquié P. The value of information and intensity of preference. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):129–139Link, Google Scholar
• Eppel T., von Winterfeldt D. Value-of-information analysis for nuclear waste storage tanks. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):157–167Link, Google Scholar
• Erkin Z., Bailey M. D., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Roberts M. S. Eliciting patients' revealed preferences: An inverse Markov decision process approach. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):358–365Link, Google Scholar
• Felli J. C., Hazen G. B. Javelin diagrams: A graphical tool for probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):93–107Link, Google Scholar
• Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93Link, Google Scholar
• Frazier P. I., Powell W. B. Paradoxes in learning and the marginal value of information. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):378–403Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M., Østerdal L. P. Cardinal scales for health evaluation. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):256–281Link, Google Scholar
• Hazen G. Adding extrinsic goals to the quality-adjusted life year model. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):3–16Link, Google Scholar
• Hazen G. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. J. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Vernik D. A. Analysis of the biological clock decision. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):114–135Link, Google Scholar
• Keisler J. Value of information in portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):177–189Link, Google Scholar
• Kilgour D. M., Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson D., Matheson J. E. Describing and valuing interventions that observe or control decision situations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(3):165–181Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W. Bayesian simulation and decision analysis: An expository survey. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):222–238Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W., McLay L. A. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171Link, Google Scholar
• Pauker S. G., Wong J. B. The influence of influence diagrams in medicine. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):238–244Link, Google Scholar
• Prange M., Bailey W. J., Couët B., Djikpesse H., Armstrong M., Galli A., Wilkinson D. Valuing future information under uncertainty using polynomial chaos. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):140–156Link, Google Scholar
• Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221Link, Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D., O'Sullivan T. M. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75Link, Google Scholar