Deterring the Smuggling of Nuclear Weapons in Container Freight Through Detection and Retaliation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1110.0199

References

  • ABT Associates The economic impact of nuclear terrorist attacks on freight transport systems in an age of seaport vulnerability. (2003) . Executive summary. Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/es-economic_impact_of_nuclear_terrorist_attacks.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Avenhaus R., Canty M. J. Playing for time: A sequential inspection game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 167(2):475–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avenhaus R., Kilgour D. M. Efficient distributions of arms-control inspection effort. Naval Res. Logist. (2004) 51(1):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avenhaus R., Canty M., Kilgour D. M., von Stengel B., Zamir S. Inspection games in arms control. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 90(3):383–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakır N. O. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakshi N., Flynn S. E., Gans N. Estimating the operational impact of container inspections at international ports. Management Sci. (2011) 57(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett A. M. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V. M., Haphuriwat N. Analytical method to identify the number of containers to inspect at U.S. ports to deter terrorist attacks. Ann. Oper. Res. (2009) . ePub ahead of print November 1, http://www.springerlink.com/content/817ju81220214027/Google Scholar
  • Boros E., Goldberg N., Kantor P. B., Word J. Optimal sequential inspection policies. Ann. Oper. Res. (2010) . ePub ahead of print October 22, http://www.springerlink.com/content/t244t46303417u8q/Google Scholar
  • Boros E., Fedzhora L., Kantor P. B., Saeger K., Stroud P. A large-scale linear programming model for finding optimal container inspection strategies. Naval Res. Logist. (2009) 56(5):404–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cochran T. B., McKinzie M. G. Detecting nuclear smuggling: Radiation monitors at U.S. ports cannot reliably detect highly enriched uranium which onshore terrorists could assemble into a nuclear bomb. Sci. Amer. (2008) 298(4):98–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dresher M. A sampling inspection problem in arms control agreements: A game-theoretic analysis. (1962) . Memorandum, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM2972.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Elsayed A., Young C. M., Xie M., Zhang H., Zhu Y. Port-of-entry inspection: Sensor deployment policy optimization. IEEE Trans. Automation Sci. Engrg. (2009) 6(2):265–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enders W., Sandler T.The Political Economy of Terrorism (2005) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) Maritime security: Observations on selected aspects of the SAFE port act. (2007) . Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07754t.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) Combating nuclear smuggling: DHS's program to procure and deploy advanced radiation detection portal monitors is likely to exceed the department's previous cost estimates. (2008) . Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d081108r.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) Combating nuclear smuggling: Recent testing raises issues about the potential effectiveness of advanced radiation detection portal monitors. (2009a) . Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10252t.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) Supply chain security: Feasibility and cost-benefit analysis would assist DHS and Congress in assessing and implementing the requirement to scan 100 percent of U.S.-bound containers. (2009b) . Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Hao M., Jin S., Zhuang J. Robustness of optimal defensive resource allocations in the face of less fully rational attacker. Proc. 2009 Indust. Engrg. Res. Conf. (2009) (IIE, Norcross, GA) 886–891Google Scholar
  • Haubrich J. G. Vagueness, credibility, and government policy. Econom. Rev. (1995) 31(1):13–19Google Scholar
  • Jackson B. A., Chalk P., Cragin R. K., Newsome B., Parachini J. V., Rosenau W., Simpson E. M., Sisson M., Temple D.Breaching the Fortress Wall: Understanding Terrorist Efforts to Overcome Defensive Technologies (2007) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins B.Will Terrorists go Nuclear? (2008) (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY) Google Scholar
  • Kilgour D. M. Site selection for on-site inspection in arms control. Contemporary Security Policy (1992) 13(3):439–462Google Scholar
  • Kilgour D. M., Brams S. J. Putting the other side “on notice” can induce compliance in arms control. J. Conflict Resolution (1992) 36(3):395–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madigan D., Mittal S., Roberts F. Sequential decision making algorithms for port of entry inspection: Overcoming computational challenges. IEEE Conf. Proc. Intelligence Security Informatics (2007) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maritime Administration U.S. custom ports (under online services & stats). (2009) . Accessed February 20, 2010, http://www.marad.dot.govGoogle Scholar
  • Martonosi S. E., Ortiz D. S., Willis H. H. Evaluating the viability of 100 per cent container inspection at America's ports. (2005) . Report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/2006/RAND_RP1220.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R.Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., McLay L. A. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morral A. R., Jackson B. A.Understanding the Role of Deterrence in Counterterrorism Security (2009) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson R. B.Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict (1997) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • National Academies Hearing on the science of security: Lessons learned in developing, testing, and operating advanced radiation monitors. (2009) . Testimony of Micah D. Lowenthal. Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/Advanced_Spectroscopic_Portals.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz S. I.Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940 (1998) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Shattan M. B. An analytic-deliberative process for the selection and deployment of radiation detection systems for shipping ports and border crossings. (2008) . Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection Secure freight scanning at a glance. (2007) . Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.customs.gov/linkhandler/cgov/newsroom/fact_sheets/trade_security/sfi/sfi_scanning.ctt/sfi_scanning.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X., Zhuang J. Balancing congestion and security in the presence of strategic applicants with private information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2011) 212(1):100–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wein L. M., Wilkins A. H., Baveja M., Flynn S. E. Preventing the importation of illicit nuclear materials in shipping containers. Risk Anal. (2006) 26(5):1377–1393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willis H. H., Ortiz D. S.Evaluating the Security of the Global Containerized Supply Chain (2004) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Willis H. H., Predd J. B., Davis P. K., Brown W. P.Measuring the Effectiveness of Border Security Efforts Between Ports-of-Entry (2010) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zhang H., Schroepfer C., Elsayed E. A. Sensor thresholds in port-of-entry inspection systems. Proc. 12th ISSAT Internat. Conf. Reliability Quality Design (2006) (ISSAT, Piscataway, NJ) 172–176Google Scholar
  • Zimmerman P. D., Lewis J. G. The bomb in the backyard. Foreign Policy (2006) October 10). http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2006/10/10/the_bomb_in_the_backyardGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.