Decomposing the Cross Derivatives of a Multiattribute Utility Function into Risk Attitude and Value

References

• Arrow K. J. The theory of risk aversion. Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (1965) (Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, Helsinki, Finland) Lecture 2Google Scholar
• Brockett P., Golden L. A class of utility functions containing all the common utility functions. Management Sci. (1987) 33(8):955–964Link, Google Scholar
• Delquié P. Interpretation of the risk tolerance coefficient in terms of maximum acceptable loss. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):5–9Link, Google Scholar
• Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L. Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk-(in)dependent utilities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):302–312Link, Google Scholar
• Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L., Rey B. Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science. Ann. Oper. Res. (2010a) 176(1):259–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L., Tsetlin I., Winkler R. Multivariate concave and convex stochastic dominance. (2010b) . Working paper 2010/29/DS, INSEAD, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Duncan G. T. A matrix measure of multivariate local risk aversion. Econometrica (1977) 45(4):895–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Sarin R. K. Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. (1982) 28(8):875–886Link, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L., Rey B., Schlesinger H. A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):117–124Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. On fates comparable to death. Management Sci. (1984) 30(4):407–422Link, Google Scholar
• Karni E. On multivariate risk aversion. Econometrica (1979) 47(6):1391–1401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefer D. L., Kirkwood C. W., Corner J. L. Perspective on decision analysis applications 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):4–22Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom R. E., Mirman L. J. Risk aversion with many commodities. J. Econom. Theory (1974) 8(3):361–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball M. S. Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58(1):53–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball M. S., Newman P., Milgate M., Eatwell J. Precautionary motives for holding assets. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (1992) 3(McMillan Press, London) 158–161Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C. W.Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):555–593Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson J. E., Abbas A. E. Utility transversality: A value-based approach. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (2005) 13(5–6):229–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. An introduction to decision analysis. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1968) I(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) Google Scholar
• O'Brien G. L., Scarsini M. Multivariate stochastic dominance and moments. Math. Oper. Res. (1991) 16(2):382–389Link, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32(1–2):122–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W., Zeckhauser R. J. Proper risk aversion. Econometrica (1987) 55(1):143–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richard S. F. Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Sci. (1975) 22(1):12–21Link, Google Scholar
• Roman S. The formula of Faa di Bruno. Amer. Math. Monthly (1980) 87(10):805–809Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scarsini M. Dominance conditions for multiattribute utility functions. Management Sci. (1988) 34(4):454–460Link, Google Scholar
• Tsetlin I., Winkler R. Multiattribute utility satisfying a preference for combining good with bad. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1942–1952Link, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar