From the Editors—Deterrence, Multiattribute Utility, and Probability and Bayes' Updating

References

• Abbas A. E. Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. Decomposing the cross derivatives of a multiattribute utility function into risk attitude and value. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):103–116Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Aczél J. The role of some functional equations in decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):215–228Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T., Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Hann I.-H. Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own-price channel. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):123–136Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Howard R. A. Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):185–206Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A. Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(2):76–87Link, Google Scholar
• Bakir N. O. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett A. M. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357Link, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P., Borle S., Kadane J. B. Common value vs. private value categories in online auctions: A distinction without a difference? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):86–98Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F. Using Bayes' rule to update an event's probabilities based on the outcomes of partially similar events. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):117–127Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F., Katok E., Keller L. R. Honoring Michael H. Rothkopf's legacy of rigor and relevance in auction theory: From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):1–4Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor S. B. Clinical applications in the decision analysis literature. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):23–25(Comment on Keefer et al. 2004)Link, Google Scholar
• Caswell D. J., Howard R. A., Paté-Cornell M. E. Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's nuclear weapons program. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):30–45Link, Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu H., Raghunathan S. Configuration of detection software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):131–148Link, Google Scholar
• Cobb B. R., Basuchoudhary A. A decision analysis approach to solving the signaling game. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):239–255Link, Google Scholar
• Dees R. A., Dabkowski M. F., Parnell G. S. Decision-focused transformation of additive value models to improve communication. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):172–184Link, Google Scholar
• Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L. Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk-(in)dependent utilities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):302–312Link, Google Scholar
• Erkin Z., Bailey M. D., Maillart L. M., Schaefer A. J., Roberts M. S. Eliciting patients' revealed preferences: An inverse Markov decision process approach. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):358–365Link, Google Scholar
• Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93Link, Google Scholar
• Haphuriwat N., Bier V. M., Willis H. H. Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):88–102Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey C. M., Østerdal L. P. Cardinal scales for health evaluation. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):256–281Link, Google Scholar
• Hausken K., Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. J. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75Link, Google Scholar
• Kadane J. B. Partial-Kelly strategies and expected utility: Small-edge asymptotics. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):4–9Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Vernik D. A. Analysis of the biological clock decision. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):114–135Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):235–237Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R. Investment and defense strategies, heuristics, and games: From the editor. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):1–3Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Kophazi K. M. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):151–154Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Abbas A., Baucells M., Bier V. M., Budescu D., Butler J. C., Delquié P., Merrick J. R. W., Salo A., Wu G. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):327–330Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Soyer R., Ruggeri F., Merrick J. R. W. Call for papers—Special issue of Decision Analysis on games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):82Link, Google Scholar
• Kilgour D. M., Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113Link, Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W. Getting the right mix of experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):43–52Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W., McLay L. A. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171Link, Google Scholar
• Pauker S. G., Wong J. B. The influence of influence diagrams in medicine. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):238–244Link, Google Scholar
• Predd J. B., Osherson D. N., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V. Aggregating probabilistic forecasts from incoherent and abstaining experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):177–189Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H. Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):167–172Link, Google Scholar
• Sandvik B., Thorlund-Petersen L. Sensitivity analysis of risk tolerance. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):313–321Link, Google Scholar
• Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221Link, Google Scholar
• van Binsbergen J. H., Marx L. Exploring relations between decision analysis and game theory. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):32–40Link, Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D., O'Sullivan T. M. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75Link, Google Scholar
• Wang G., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V., Osherson D. N. Aggregating large sets of probabilistic forecasts by weighted coherent adjustment. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):128–144Link, Google Scholar
• Yang X., Kadane J. B., Crane H. M., Kitahata M. M. Whether to retest the lipids of HIV-infected patients: How much does fasting bias matter? Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):145–157Link, Google Scholar