Consistency Among Elicitation Techniques for Intertemporal Choice: A Within-Subjects Investigation of the Anomalies

References

• Ahlbrecht M., Weber M. An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. (1997) 43(6):813–826Link, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G., Haslam N., Loewenstein G., Elster J. Hyperbolic discounting. Choice Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 57–92Google Scholar
• Benzion U., Rapoport A., Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):270–284Link, Google Scholar
• Chapman G. B. Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 67(1):59–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G. B., Elstein E. S. Valuing the future: Temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making (1995) 15(4):373–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay reinforcement. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. (1967) 10(1):67–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools Suite (2001) 2nd rev. ed.(Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C., Rubenstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23(3):677–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S. Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? J. Risk Uncertainty (2003) 26(1):39–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S., Loewenstein G. Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. J. Risk Uncertainty (2008) 37(2):221–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):351–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigliotti G., Sopher B. Violations of present-value maximization in income. Choice Theory Decision (1997) 43(1):45–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhouse S. W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika (1959) 24(2):95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyse J. L., Keller L. R., Eppel T. Valuing environmental outcomes: Preferences for constant or improving sequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 87(2):253–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty D. J., Thompson K. J., Krantz D. H., Weber E. U. How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. (2011) . Working paper, Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New YorkCrossref, Google Scholar
• Herrnstein R. J., Rachlin H., Laibson D. I.The Matching Law (1997) (Russell Sage Foundation/Harvard University Press, New York/Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Stratzzera E. Examining the predictive accuracy among discounting models. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 24(2):143–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby K. N., Marakovic N. N. Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64(1):22–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans T. C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica (1960) 28(2):207–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Elster J.Choice Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Negative time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(2):347–352Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretations. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(2):573–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Preference for sequences of outcomes. Psych. Rev. (1993) 100(1):91–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Sicherman N. Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles? J. Labor Econom. (1991) 9(1):67–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Thaler R. H. Anomalies; intertemporal choice. J. Econom. Perspect. (1989) 3(4):181–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauchly J. W. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. (1940) 11(2):204–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):103–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olivola C. Y., Wang S. W. Patience auctions: The impact of time vs. money bidding on elicited discount rates. (2011) . Working paper, Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UKGoogle Scholar
• Read D., Powell M. Reasons for sequence preferences. J. Behav. Decision Making (2002) 15(5):433–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D., Roelofsma P. H. M. P. Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 91(2):140–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D., Loewenstein G., Kalyanaraman S. Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification bias. J. Behav. Decision Making (1999) 12(4):257–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roelofsma P. H. M. P., Read D. Intransitive intertemporal choice. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13(2):161–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1937) 4(2):155–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt D. R., Kemper T. D. Preference for different sequences of increasing or decreasing rewards. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 66(1):89–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholten M., Read D. The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psych. Rev. (2010) 117(3):925–944Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelley M. K. Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates. Management Sci. (1993) 39(7):806–815Link, Google Scholar
• Stevenson M. K. The impact of temporal context and risk on the judged value of future outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 52(3):455–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8(3):201–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(3):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber B. J., Chapman G. B. The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(2):104–118Crossref, Google Scholar