From the Editor—Multiattribute and Intertemporal Preferences, Probability, and Stochastic Processes: Models and Assessment

References

• Abbas A. E. Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. Decomposing the cross derivatives of a multiattribute utility function into risk attitude and value. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(2):103–116Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E. The multiattribute utility tree. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(3):180–205Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Aczél J. The role of some functional equations in decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):215–228Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Hann I.-H. Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own-price channel. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):123–136Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Howard R. A. Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):185–206Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas A. E., Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T., Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A. Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(2):76–87Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357Link, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P., Borle S., Kadane J. B. Common value vs. private value categories in online auctions: A distinction without a difference? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):86–98Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F. Using Bayes' rule to update an event's probabilities based on the outcomes of partially similar events. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):117–127Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley R. F., Katok E., Keller L. R. Honoring Michael H. Rothkopf's legacy of rigor and relevance in auction theory: From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):1–4Link, Google Scholar
• Brandão L. E., Dyer J. S., Hahn W. J. Using binomial decision trees to solve real-option valuation problems. Decision Anal. (2005a) 2(2):69–88Link, Google Scholar
• Brandão L. E., Dyer J. S., Hahn W. J. Response to comments on Brandão et al. (2005). Decision Anal. (2005b) 2(2):103–109Link, Google Scholar
• Butler J. C., Dyer J. S., Jia J. Using attributes to predict objectives in preference models. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):100–116Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J., Xu L., Whinston A. Managing project failure risk through contingent contracts in procurement auctions. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):23–39Link, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., Epstein L. G. A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theory. J. Econom. Theory (1989) 49(2):207–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., Karni E. Choquet expected utility with a finite state space: Commutativity and act-independence. J. Econom. Theory (1994) 62(2):469–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., MacCrimmon K. R. Alpha-nu choice theory: A generalization of expected utility theory. (1979) . Working Paper 669, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
• Chew S. H., Waller W. S. Empirical tests of weighted utility theory. J. Math. Psych. (1986) 30(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., Epstein L. G., Wakker P. A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theory: Correction and comment. J. Econom. Theory (1993) 59(1):183–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S. H., Karni E., Safra Z. Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility theory with rank-dependent probabilities. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42(2):370–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dees R. A., Dabkowski M. F., Parnell G. S. Decision-focused transformation of additive value models to improve communication. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):172–184Link, Google Scholar
• Denuit M., Eeckhoudt L. Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk-(in)dependent utilities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):302–312Link, Google Scholar
• Guyse J. L., Simon J. Consistency among elicitation techniques for intertemporal choice: A within-subjects investigation of the anomalies. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):233–246Link, Google Scholar
• Guyse J. L., Keller L. R., Eppel T. Valuing environmental outcomes: Preferences for constant or improving sequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 87(2):253–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn W. J., Dyer J. S. A discrete time approach for modeling two-factor mean-reverting stochastic processes. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):220–232Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffman K., Menon D. A practical combinatorial clock exchange for spectrum licenses. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):58–77Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. J. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75Link, Google Scholar
• Keelin T. W., Powley B. W. Quantile-parameterized distributions. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):206–219Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Soyer R., Ruggeri F., Merrick J. R. W. Call for papers—Special issue of Decision Analysis on games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):82Link, Google Scholar
• Keller L. R., Abbas A., Baucells M., Bier V. M., Budescu D., Butler J. C., Delquié P., Merrick J. R. W., Salo A., Wu G. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):327–330Link, Google Scholar
• Kilgour D. M., Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W. Getting the right mix of experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):43–52Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57Link, Google Scholar
• Mild P., Salo A. Combining a multiattribute value function with an optimization model: An application to dynamic resource allocation for infrastructure maintenance. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):139–152Link, Google Scholar
• Predd J. B., Osherson D. N., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V. Aggregating probabilistic forecasts from incoherent and abstaining experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):177–189Link, Google Scholar
• Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221Link, Google Scholar
• Schwartz E., Smith J. E. Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Management Sci. (2000) 46(7):893–911Link, Google Scholar
• Shachat J., Swarthout J. T. Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):6–22Link, Google Scholar
• Simon J., Melese F. A multiattribute sealed-bid procurement auction with multiple budgets for government vendor selection. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):170–179Link, Google Scholar
• Smith J. Alternative approaches for solving real-options problems (Comment on Brandão et al. 2005). Decision Anal. (2005) 2(2):89–102Link, Google Scholar
• Wang T., Dyer J. S. Valuing multifactor real options using an implied binomial tree. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):185–195Link, Google Scholar
• Wang G., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V., Osherson D. N. Aggregating large sets of probabilistic forecasts by weighted coherent adjustment. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):128–144Link, Google Scholar