Tailored Scoring Rules for Probabilities

References

• Bickel J. E. Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):233–251Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel J. E. Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65Link, Google Scholar
• Brier G. W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probabilities. Monthly Weather Rev. (1950) 78(1):1–3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawid A. P. The geometry of proper scoring rules. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (2007) 59(1):77–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirkzwager A. Testing with personal probabilities: 11-year-olds can correctly estimate their personal probabilities. Educational Psych. Measurement (1996) 56(6):957–971Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T. Editorial: Probabilistic forecasting. J. Royal Statist. Soc. A (2008) 171(2):319–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T., Raftery A. Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2007) 102(477):359–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. J. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. J. Economic interpretation of probabilities estimated by maximum likelihood or score. Management Sci. (2011) 57(2):308–314Link, Google Scholar
• Jose V. R. R., Nau R. F., Winkler R. L. Scoring rules, generalized entropy, and utility maximization. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(5):1148–1157Link, Google Scholar
• Jose V. R. R., Nau R. F., Winkler R. L. Sensitivity to distance and baseline distributions in forecast evaluation. Management Sci. (2009) 55(4):582–590Link, Google Scholar
• Lopez J. A. Evaluating the predictive accuracy of volatility models. J. Forecasting (2001) 20(2):87–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy J. Measures of the value of information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1956) 42(9):654–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H. A note on the utility of probabilistic predictions and the probability score in the cost-loss ratio decision situation. J. Appl. Meteorol. (1966) 5(4):534–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H. Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part I. Two-state situation. J. Appl. Meteorol. (1972a) 11(2):273–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H. Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part II. N-state situation. J. Appl. Meteorol. (1972b) 11(8):1183–1192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H. Hedging and skill scores for probability forecasts. J. Appl. Meteorol. (1973) 12(1):215–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offerman T., Sonnemans J., van de Kuilen G., Wakker P. P. A truth serum for non-Bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) 76(4):1461–1489Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Hagan A., Buck C. E., Daneshkhah A., Eiser J. R., Garthwaite P. H., Jenkinson D. J., Oakley J. E., Rakow T.Uncertain Judgments: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage L. J. Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1971) 66(336):783–801Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1969) 64(327):1073–1078Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Evaluating probabilities: Asymmetric scoring rules. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1395–1405Link, Google Scholar
• Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test (1996) 5(1):1–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J. F. External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1982) 30(1):132–156Crossref, Google Scholar