Do Bayesians Learn Their Way Out of Ambiguity?

References

• Abel A. B. An exploration of the effects of pessimism and doubt on asset returns. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2002) 26(7–8):1075–1092Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adam K., Marcet A., Nicolini J. P. Stock market volatility and learning. (2008) . Working Paper 862, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am main, Germany. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp.862.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Anscombe F. J., Aumann R. J. A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Amer. Statist. (1963) 34(1):199–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Thaler R., Constantinides G. M., Harris M., Stulz R. M. A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics and Finance (2003) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1053–1123Google Scholar
• Barsky R. B., DeLong J. B. Why does the stock market fluctuate? Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(2):291–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell D., Dubins L. Merging of opinions with increasing information. Ann. Math. Statist. (1962) 33(3):882–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A., Heaton J. B. Competing theories of financial anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15(2):575–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman D., LeCam L., Schwartz L. Consistent estimates and zero-one sets. Ann. Math. Statist. (1964) 35(1):157–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cecchetti S. G., Lam P., Nelson C. M. Asset pricing with distorted beliefs: Are equity returns too good to be true? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):787–805Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A., Eichberger J., Grant S. Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 137(1):538–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cogley T., Sargent T. J. The market price of risk and the equity premium: A legacy of the Great Depression? J. Monetary Econom. (2008) 55(3):454–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Gilboa I., Jaffray J. Y., Schmeidler D. An experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs. Risk, Decision, Policy (2000) 5(2):123–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., DeGroot M. H., Holt C. A. Sequential investment decisions with Bayesian learning. Management Sci. (1978) 24(7):712–718Link, Google Scholar
• Diaconis P., Freedman D. On the consistency of Bayes estimates. Ann. Statist. (1986) 14(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doob J. L. Application of the theory of martingales. Le calcul des probabilites et ses applications (1949) 13(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris) 23–27Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGoogle Scholar
• Eichberger J., Kelsey D. E-capacities and the Ellsberg paradox. Theory Decision (1999) 46(2):107–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichberger J., Grant S., Kelsey D. Updating Choquet beliefs. J. Math. Econom. (2006) 43(7–8):888–899Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75(4):643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L. G. A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(3):579–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L. G., Schneider M. Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econom. Theory (2003) 113(1):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L. G., Schneider M. Learning under ambiguity. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 74(4):1275–1303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P. Revisiting Savage in a conditional world. Econom. Theory (2002) 20(1):83–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P., Marinacci M. Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 102(2):251–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. (1987) 16(1):65–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique priors. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18(2):141–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Updating ambiguous beliefs. J. Econom. Theory (1993) 59(1):33–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond P. J. Consequentialist foundation for expected utility. Theory Decision (1988) 25(1):25–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanany E., Klibanoff P. Updating preferences with multiple priors. Theoret. Econom. (2007) 2(3):261–298Google Scholar
• Hanany E., Klibanoff P. Updating ambiguity averse preferences. B. E. J. Theoret. Econom. (2009) 9(Advances). Article 37Google Scholar
• Hansen L. P., Sargent T. J. Robust control and model uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (2001) 91(2):60–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L. P., Sargent T. J.Robustness (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L. P., Sargent T. J., Tallarini T. D. Robust permanent income and pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(4):873–907Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes R. M., Bromiley P., Devers C. E., Holcomb T. R., McGuire J. B. Management theory applications of prospect theory: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. J. Management (2011) 37(4):1069–1107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lijoi A., Pruenster I., Walker S. O. Extending Doob's consistency theorem to nonparametric densities. Bernoulli (2004) 10(4):651–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig A., Zimper A. A parsimonious Choquet model of subjective life-expectancy. (2011a) . Mimeo, Center for Macroeconomic Research, University of Cologne, Köln, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Ludwig A., Zimper A. Choquet Bayesian learning with an application to the risk-free rate puzzle. (2011b) . Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
• Machina M. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econom. Literature (1989) 27(4):1622–1668Google Scholar
• Maenhout P. J. Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Rev. Financial Stud. (2004) 17(4):951–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinacci M. Limit laws for non-additive probabilities and their frequentist interpretation. J. Econom. Theory (1999) 84(2):145–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinacci M. Learning from ambiguous urns. Statist. Papers (2002) 43(1):145–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra R., Prescott E. C. The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1985) 15(2):145–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muth J. F. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica (1961) 29(3):315–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pires C. P. A rule for updating ambiguous beliefs. Theory Decision (2002) 53(2):137–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J. P. Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian J. Agricultural Econom. (1981) 25(2):160–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J. P. A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1982) 3(4):323–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudin W.Principles of Mathematical Analysis (1976) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Sarin R., Wakker P. P. A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility. Econometrica (1992) 60(6):1255–1272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R., Wakker P. P. Dynamic choice and nonexpected utility. J. Risk Uncertainty (1998a) 17(2):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R., Wakker P. P. Revealed likelihood and Knightian uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1998b) 16(3):223–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. Integral representation without additivity. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1986) 97(2):255–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica (1989) 57(3):571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siniscalchi M. Dynamic choice under ambiguity. Theoret. Econom. (2011) 6(3):379–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermann A. How learning in financial markets generates excess volatility and predictability in stock prices. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(4):1135–1145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonks I. Bayesian learning and the optimal investment decision of the firm. Econom. J. (1983) 93(Supplement: Conference papers):87–98Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representations of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Wakker P. P. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica (1995) 63(6):1255–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K.Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance (1979) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K. A Bayesian perspective on biases in risk perception. Econom. Lett. (1985) 17(1–2):59–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K. Do smokers underestimate risks? J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(6):1253–1269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K. Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1991) 73(4):577–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K., O'Connor C. J. Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: Are workers Bayesian decision makers? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(5):942–956Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P. Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle. Econometrica (2001) 69(4):1039–1059Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P. On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111(1):236–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P.Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (2010) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P., Tversky A. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 7(2):147–176Crossref, Google Scholar