From the Editors—Probability Scoring Rules, Ambiguity, Multiattribute Terrorist Utility, and Sensitivity Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1110.0222

References

  • Abbas A. E. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E. Decomposing the cross derivatives of a multiattribute utility function into risk attitude and value. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(2):103–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas A. E. The multiattribute utility tree. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(3):180–205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakır N. O. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett A. M. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel J. E. Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel J. E. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley R. F. Using Bayes' rule to update an event's probabilities based on the outcomes of partially similar events. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):117–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley R. F., Katok E., Keller L. R. Honoring Michael H. Rothkopf's legacy of rigor and relevance in auction theory: From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):1–4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Budescu D. V., Yu H.-T. To Bayes or not to Bayes? A comparison of two classes of models of information aggregation. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(3):145–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caswell D. J., Howard R. A., Paté-Cornell M. E. Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's nuclear weapons program. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):30–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusoglu H., Raghunathan S. Configuration of detection software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):131–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chambal S. P., Weir J. D., Kahraman Y. R., Gutman A. J. A practical procedure for customizable one-way sensitivity analysis in additive value models. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):303–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb B. R., Basuchoudhary A. A decision analysis approach to solving the signaling game. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):239–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dees R. A., Dabkowski M. F., Parnell G. S. Decision-focused transformation of additive value models to improve communication. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):172–184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feng T., Keller L. R. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frazier P. I., Powell W. B. Paradoxes in learning and the marginal value of information. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):378–403LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grant A., Johnstone D., Kwon O. K. Optimal betting strategies for simultaneous games. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):10–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guyse J. L., Simon J. Consistency among elicitation techniques for intertemporal choice: A within-subjects investigation of the anomalies. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):233–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn W. J., Dyer J. S. A discrete time approach for modeling two-factor mean-reverting stochastic processes. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):220–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haphuriwat N., Bier V. M., Willis H. H. Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):88–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K., Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnstone D. J. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnstone D. J., Jose V. R. R., Winkler R. L. Tailored scoring rules for probabilities. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):256–268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane J. B. Partial-Kelly strategies and expected utility: Small-edge asymptotics. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):4–9LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katsikopoulos K. V. Psychological heuristics for making inferences: Definition, performance, and the emerging theory and practice. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):10–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keelin T. W., Powley B. W. Quantile-parameterized distributions. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R. Investment and defense strategies, heuristics, and games: From the editor. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(1):1–3LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R. From the editor: Multiattribute and intertemporal preferences, probability, and stochastic processes: Models and assessment. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(3):165–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R., Kophazi K. M. From the editors: Deterrence, multiattribute utility, and probability and Bayes' updating. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):83–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R., Abbas A., Baucells M., Bier V. M., Budescu D., Butler J. C., Delquié P., Merrick J. R. W., Salo A., Wu G. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):327–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L. R., Soyer R., Ruggeri F., Merrick J. R. W. Call for papers—Special issue of Decision Analysis on games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilgour D. M., Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W. Bayesian simulation and decision analysis- An expository survey. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):222–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., McLay L. A. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick J. R. W., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mild P., Salo A. Combining a multiattribute value function with an optimization model: An application to dynamic resource allocation for infrastructure maintenance. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):139–152LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Müller P., Berry D. A., Grieve A. P., Krams M. A Bayesian decision-theoretic dose-finding trial. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):197–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mumpower J. L. Playing squash against Ralph Keeney: Should weaker players always prefer shorter games? Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):71–77LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H. Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):167–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon J., Melese F. A multiattribute sealed-bid procurement auction with multiple budgets for government vendor selection. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):170–179LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsetlin I., Winkler R. L. On equivalent target-oriented formulations for multiattribute utility. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):94–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Binsbergen J. H., Marx L. Exploring relations between decision analysis and game theory. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):32–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D., O'Sullivan T. M. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang C., Bier V. M. Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multiattribute terrorist utility. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):286–302LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang G., Kulkarni S. R., Poor H. V., Osherson D. N. Aggregating large sets of probabilistic forecasts by weighted coherent adjustment. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):128–144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler R. L., Clemen R. T. Multiple experts vs. multiple methods: Combining correlation assessments. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):167–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang X., Kadane J. B., Crane H. M., Kitahata M. M. Whether to retest the lipids of HIV-infected patients: How much does fasting bias matter? Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):145–157LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zimper A. Do Bayesians learn their way out of ambiguity? Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):269–285LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.