Embedded Nash Bargaining: Risk Aversion and Impatience

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1110.0224

References

  • Bickel J. E. Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):233–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandenburger A. Knowledge and equilibrium in games. J. Econom. Perspect. (1992) 6(4):83–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee K., Samuelson W. Bargaining under incomplete information. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(5):835–851LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corner J. L., Corner P. D. Characteristics of decisions in decision analysis practice. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1995) 46(3):304–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C., Rubinstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23(3):677–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. C. Subjective probability and the theory of games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey's paper. Management Sci. (1982) 28(2):120–124LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. C., Selten R. A generalized Nash solution for two person bargaining games with incomplete information. Management Sci. (1972) 18(5):80–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A. Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. (1988) 34(6):679–695LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane J. B., Larkey P. D. Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Sci. (1982) 28(2):113–120LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. W. Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):51–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nachman D. C. Risk aversion, impatience, and optimal timing decisions. J. Econom. Theory (1975) 11(2):196–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18(2):155–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prakash P. On the consistency of a gambler with time preference. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 15(1):92–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rasmusen E.Games and Information (1989) (Basil Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roth A. E., Rothblum U. G. Risk aversion and Nash's solution for bargaining games with risky outcomes. Econometrica (1982) 50(3):639–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):97–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Safra Z., Zhou L., Zilcha I. Risk aversion in the Nash bargaining problem with risky outcomes and risky disagreement points. Econometrica (1990) 58(4):961–965CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson W., Aumann R. J., Hart S. Cooperative models of bargaining. Handbook of Game Theory (1994) 2(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) . Chap. 35Google Scholar
  • von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.