Formulating Asymmetric Decision Problems as Decision Circuits

References

• Bhattacharjya D., Shachter R., Parr R., van der Gaag L. Evaluating influence diagrams with decision circuits. Proc. 23rd Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (2007) (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR) 9–16Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjya D., Shachter R., McAllester D., Myullymki P. Sensitivity analysis in decision circuits. Proc. 24th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (2008) (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR) 34–42Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjya D., Shachter R., Grunwald P., Spirtes P. Three new sensitivity analysis methods for influence diagrams. Proc. 26th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (2010) (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR) 56–64Google Scholar
• Bielza C., Shenoy P. A comparison of graphical techniques for asymmetric decision problems. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1552–1569Link, Google Scholar
• Call H., Miller W. A comparison of approaches and implementations for automating decision analysis. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1990) 30(1–3):115–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covaliu Z., Oliver R. Representation and solution of decision problems using sequential decision diagrams. Management Sci. (1995) 41(12):1860–1881Link, Google Scholar
• Darwiche A. A differential approach to inference in Bayesian networks. J. ACM (2003) 50(3):280–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckerman D., Shachter R. Decision-theoretic foundations for causal reasoning. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. (1995) 3(1):405–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R., Matheson J., Howard R., Matheson J. Influence diagrams. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1984) II(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) 721–762Google Scholar
• Jensen F., Jensen F. V., Dittmer S., Lopez de Mantaras R., Poole D. From influence diagrams to junction trees. Proc. 10th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (1994) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 367–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen F. V., Nielsen T. D., Shenoy P. Sequential influence diagrams: A unified asymmetry framework. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning (2006) 42(1):101–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1986) 34(6):871–882Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R., Bhattacharjya D., Grunwald P., Spirtes P. Dynamic programming in influence diagrams with decision circuits. Proc. 26th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (2010) (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR) 509–516Google Scholar
• Shachter R., Heckerman D. Thinking backward for knowledge acquisition. AI Magazine (1987) 8(3):55–61Google Scholar
• Shachter R., Peot M., Dubois D., Wellman M. P., D'Ambrosio B., Smets P. Decision making using probabilistic inference methods. Proc. Eighth Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (1992) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 276–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafer G.The Art of Causal Conjecture (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Shenoy P. Game trees for decision analysis. Theory Decision (1998) 44(2):149–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenoy P. Valuation network representation and solution of asymmetric decision problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 121(3):579–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. Q., Anderson P. E. Conditional independence and chain event graphs. Artificial Intelligence (2008) 172(1):42–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J., Holtzman S., Matheson J. Structuring conditional relationships in influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(2):280–297Link, Google Scholar