Expert Judgment, Meta-analysis, and Participatory Risk Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0234

References

  • Anzures-Cabrera J, Higgins JPT. Graphical displays for meta-analysis; an overview with suggestions for practice. Res. Synthesis Methods (2010) 1(1):66–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayley C, Melnick EL, Everitt BS. Public participation. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment (2008) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) 1383–1391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BBC News Taskforce tackles asteroid threat. (2000) . (January 4) http://news.bc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/589566.stmGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett PG, Calman KC, Curtis S, Fischbacher-Smith D. Risk Communication and Public Health (2010) 2nd ed.(Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 299–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binzel RP. The Torino impact hazard scale. Planetary Space Sci. (2000) 48(4):297–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bizer C, Heath T, Berners Lee. Linked data—The story so far. Internat. J. Semantic Web Inform. Systems (2009) 5(3):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis (2009) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briner RB, Denyer D, Rousseau DM. Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Acad. Management Perspect. (2009) 23(4):19–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman CR, Morrison D. Impacts on the earth by asteriods and comets: Assessing the hazard. Nature (1994) 367(6458):33–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke RM. Experts in Uncertainty (1991) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Cooke RM. Expert judgement studies. Reliability Engrg. Safety Systems (2007) 93(5):655–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke RM, Goossens LHJ. TU Delft expert judgement database. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2007) 93(5):657–674CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke RM, Bedford T, Kraan B. Report on the Benchmark Workshop on Uncertainty/Sensitivity Analysis Codes (1997) (European Safety and Reliability Association, Delft, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Paisley S, Jones DR. Use of evidence in economic decision models: Practical issues and methodological challenges. Health Economics (2007) 16(12):1277–1286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S, Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AFM. Group consensus probability distributions: A critical survey. Bayesian Statistics (1985) 2(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 183–201Google Scholar
  • French S. Modelling, making inferences and making decisions: The roles of sensitivity analysis. TOP (2003) 11(2):229–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S. Aggregating expert judgement. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales (2011) 105(1):181–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S, Maule AJ, Papamichail KN. Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support (2009) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French S, Rios Insua D, Ruggeri F. e-Participation and decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geyskens I, Krishnan R, Steenkamp J-BEM, Cunha PV. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. J. Management (2009) 35(2):393–419CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glanville J, Paisley S, Shemilt I, Mugford M, Vale L, Marsh K, Donaldson C. Searching for evidence for cost-effectiveness decisions. Evidence-Based Decisions and Economics (2010) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 79–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goossens LHJ, Kelly GN. Special Issue: Expert judgement and accident consequence uncertainty analysis. Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2000) 90(3):293–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory RS, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing TeamPachauri RK, Reisinger A. Climate change 2007 synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment. (2008) . Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, p. 104Google Scholar
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing TeamWalser ML, Nodvin SC, Cleveland CH. IPCC fourth assessment report, Working Group I: Uncertainty guidance note for the fourth assessment report. Encyclopedia of Earth (2010) . Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Maule AJ, Svenson O, Montgomery H. Positive and negative decision frames: A protocol analysis of the Asian disease problem of Kahneman and Tversky. Process and Structure in Human Decision Making (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
  • Maule AJ, Starbuck W, Hodgkinson G. Risk communication and organisations. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (2008) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 518–533Google Scholar
  • Mellor F. Negotiating uncertainty. Public Understanding Sci. (2010) 29(1):16–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montibeller G, Gummer H, Tumidei D. Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (2006) 14(1–3):5–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman C. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Morgan MG. Characterising and dealing with uncertainty: Insights from integrated assessment of climate change. Integrated Asessment (2003) 4(1):46–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moss R, Schneider S, Pachauri R, Taniguchi T, Tanaka K. Uncertainties. Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (2000) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva) Google Scholar
  • Near-Earth Object Mission Advisory Panel (NEOMAP) Space mission priorities for near-earth object risk asseessment and reduction. (2004) . Report, Near-Earth Object Mission Advisory Panel, European Space Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  • O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser R, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson D, Oakley JE, Rakow T. Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Sutton PJ. Evidence-based management. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(1):62–76Google Scholar
  • Renn O. Risk Governance (2008) (Earthscan, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rios Insua D, French S. e-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Perspective (2010) (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Advances in Group Decision and NegotiationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM. Sensitivity Anal. (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
  • Savage LJ. The Foundations of Statistics (1972) (Dover, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shemilt I, Mugford M, Vale L, Marsh K, Donaldson C. Evidence-Based Decisions and Economics: Health Care, Social Welfare, Education, and Criminal Justice (2010) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J, Antunes CH. Scenario-based multi-criteria decision analysis. URPDM2010: Uncertainty and Robustness in Planning and Decision Making (2010) (Coimbra, Portugal)Google Scholar
  • Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J. Integration of multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning. Omega (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Wright G, Goodwin P. Future-focused thinking: Combining scenario planning with decision analysis. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1999) 8(6):311–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.