Modeling State-Dependent Priorities of Malicious Agents

References

• Andersen DF, Rohrbaugh J. Some conceptual and technical problems in integrating models of judgment with simulation models. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1992) 22(1):21–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakır NO, Kardes E. A stochastic game model on container security. 2011 IEEE Internat. Conf. Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) (2011) (IEEE, New York) 110–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart T. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (2001) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Google Scholar
• Bennett P, Howard N. Rationality, emotion, and preference change drama-theoretic models of choice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 92(3):603–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley R. Becker's thesis and three models of preference change. Politics Philosophy Econom. (2009) 8(2):223–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brans JP, Macharis C, Kunsch P, Chevalier A, Schwaninger M. Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 109(2):428–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broder JF. Risk Analysis and the Security Survey (2006) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, VT) Google Scholar
• Chamberlain T. Systems dynamics model of Al-Qa'ida and United States “competition”. J. Homeland Security Emergency Management (2007) 4(3):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choucri N, Goldsmith D, Madnick S, Mistree D, Morrison JB, Siegel M. Using system dynamics to model and better understand state stability. (2007) . Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeCrossref, Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service Homeland Security: Protecting airliners from terrorist missiles. (2006) . Report, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC. Accessed May 15, 2010, http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL31741_02162006.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Cordes B, Hoffman B, Jenkins BM, Kellen K, Moran S, Sater W. Trends in international terrorism, 1982 and 1983. (1984) . RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed March 15, 2010, http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA483957&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdfGoogle Scholar
• D'Amato G. Air crash investigation: Lockerbie. (2009) . National Geographic Channel, London. Accessed November 29, 2010, http://natgeotv.com/uk/air-crash-investigation/lockerbieGoogle Scholar
• Defense Update IED—A weapon's profile. (2006) . (Updated August 23). Accessed May 24, 2010, http://defense-update.com/features/du-3-04/ied.htmGoogle Scholar
• Drake CJM. The role of ideology in terrorists' target selection. Terrorism Political Violence (1998) 10(2):53–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• El-Nasr MS, Yen J, Ioerger TR. Flame—Fuzzy logic adaptive model of emotions. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Systems (2000) 3(3):219–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elster J. Emotions and economic theory. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36(1):47–74Google Scholar
• Enders W, Sandler T. The Political Economy of Terrorism (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• English R. Terrorism: How to Respond (2010) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Forrester JW. Principles of Systems (1968) 2nd ed.(Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA) Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):351–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardiner PC, Ford A, Legasto AA, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM. Which policy run is best, and who says so? System Dynamics: TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences (1980) 14(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 241–257Google Scholar
• Gearty C. Terrorism and morality. Whitehall Papers (2004) 61(1):19–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruver WA, Ford A, Gardiner PC. Public policy analysis using three systems science techniques. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1984) 14(2):355–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grynkewich A, Reifel C. Modeling jihad: A system dynamics model of the Salafist group for preaching and combat financial subsystem. Strategic Insights (2006) 5(8):1–27Google Scholar
• Hansson SO, Grüne-Yanoff T, Zalta EN. Preferences. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) . Accessed March 15, 2010, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/preferences/Google Scholar
• Hausken K, Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70Link, Google Scholar
• Haynes SR, Kannampallil TG, Larson LL, Garg N. Optimizing anti-terrorism resource allocation. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2005) 56(3):299–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (1996) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney RL. Modeling values for anti-terrorism analysis. Risk Anal. (2007) 27(3):585–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly H. Testimony of Dr. Henry Kelly, President of the Federation of American Scientists before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. (2002) . Accessed December 6, 2011, http://www.fas.org/ssp/docs/030602-kellytestimony.htmGoogle Scholar
• Kunsch P, Springael J. Simulation with system dynamics and fuzzy reasoning of a tax policy to reduce CO2 emissions in the residential sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2008) 185(3):1285–1299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunsch P, Springael J, Brans JP. An adaptive multicriteria control methodology in sustainable development-case study: A CO2-ecotax. Belgian J. Oper. Res., Statist., Comput. Sci. (1999) 39(2–3):109–143Google Scholar
• Lin C-H, Liou D-Y, Wu K-W. Opportunities and challenges created by terrorism. Technological Forecasting Soc. Change (2007) 74(2):148–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linotte D, Lomborg B. Terrorism. Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems: Costs and Benefits (2007) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 263–282Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 65(3):272–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Elster J, Skog OJ. A visceral account of addiction. Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 235–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(2):426–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Angner E, Loewenstein G, Read D, Baumeister RF. Predicting and indulging changing preferences. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 114–143Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Lerner JS, Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH. The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of Affective Science (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 619–642Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. The heat of the moment: Modeling interactions between affect and deliberation. (2007) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. http://www.arts.cornell.edu/econ/edo1/heat.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Nagin D, Paternoster R. The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. J. Res. Crime Delinquency (1997) 34(4):443–473Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Read D, Baumeister RF. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
• Maerli MB, Schaper A, Barnaby F. The characteristics of nuclear terrorist weapons. Amer. Behav. Scientist (2003) 46(6):727–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Major JA. Advanced techniques for modeling terrorism risk. J. Risk Finance (2002) 4(1):15–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCormick GH. Terrorist decision making. Ann. Rev. Political Sci. (2003) 6:473–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrick J, McLay LA. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick J, Parnell GS. A comparative analysis of PRA and intelligent adversary methods for counterterrorism risk management. Risk Anal. (2011) 31(9):1488–1510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mickolus EF. Transnational Terrorism: A Chronology of Events, 1968–979 (1980) (Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
• National Terror Alert Suitcase nukes. (2009) . Accessed March 15, 2010, http://www.nationalterroralert.com/suitcasenuke/Google Scholar
• Parnell GS, Smith CM, Moxley FI. Intelligent adversary risk analysis: A bioterrorism risk management model. Risk Anal. (2010) 30(1):32–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell ME, Guikema S. Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Oper. Res. (2002) 7(4):5–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard RW. Affective Computing (2000) (MIT press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raghunathan R, Pham MT. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79(1):56–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson L. What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Terrorist Threat (2007) (John Murray, London) Google Scholar
• Rios J, Insua DR. Adversarial risk analysis for counterterrorism modeling. Risk Anal. (2011) . ePub ahead of print December 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01713.xGoogle Scholar
• Rosoff H, John R. Decision analysis by proxy for the rational terrorist. Quantitative Risk Analysis for Security Applications (QRASA) Workshop IJCAI 2009 (2009) Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
• Russell JA, Barrett LF. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76(5):805–819Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandler T, Lapan HE. The calculus of dissent: An analysis of terrorists' choice of targets. Synthese (1988) 76(2):245–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos SP, Belton V, Howick S. Enhanced performance measurement using OR: A case study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2008) 59(6):762–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Security Service MI5 Terrorist methods. (2011) . Accessed October 24, https://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/terrorist-methods.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Springael J, Kunsch P, Brans JP. A multicriteria based system dynamics modelling of traffic congestion caused by urban commuters. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 10:81–97Google Scholar
• Tzu S, Giles L. The Art of War (2008) (Wilder Publications, El Paso, TX) Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security DHS: Fact sheet: Proposed protective action guides for radiological dispersion and improvised nuclear devices. (2006) . Accessed May 24, 2010, http://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=476978Google Scholar
• von Auer L. Dynamic Preferences, Choice Mechanisms, and Welfare (1998) (Springer Verlag, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D, O'Sullivan TM. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson GD, Olwell DH. Game theory in an age of terrorism: How can statisticians contribute. Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism (2006) (Springer, New York) 292–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woo G. Terrorism risk. Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security (2006) (Wiley, London) 1–17Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationWorld Report on Violence and Health (2002) (World Health Organization, Geneva) Google Scholar