Resource Allocation for Homeland Defense: Dealing with the Team Effect

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0242

References

  • Arce M DG, Sandler T. Counterterrorism: A game-theoretic analysis. J. Conflict Resolution (2005) 49(2):183–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arya A, Fellingham JC, Young RA. The effects of risk aversion on production decisions in decentralized organizations. Management Sci. (1993) 39(7):794–805LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V, Wilson AG, Wilson GD, Olwell DH. Game-theoretic and reliability methods in counterterrorism and security. Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism: Game Theory, Modeling, Syndromic Surveillance, and Biometric Authentication (2006) (Springer, New York) 23–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier VM, Nagaraj A, Abhichandani V. Protection of simple series and parallel systems with components of different values. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2005) 87(3):315–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanning RW, Kleindorfer PR, Sankar CS. Theory of multistage contractual incentives with application to design-to-cost. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1982) 29(1):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M. Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown G, Carlyle M, Salmerón J, Wood K. Defending critical infrastructure. Interfaces (2006) 36(6):530–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R, Ross TW. Product warranties and double moral hazard. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(1):103–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Digne NS, Zhuang J, Bier VM. Secrecy in defensive allocations as a strategy for achieving more cost-effective attacker deterrence. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. (2009) 5(1):31–43Google Scholar
  • Frey BS, Luechinger S. Decentralization as a disincentive for terror. Eur. J. Political Econom. (2004) 20(2):509–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Game Theory for Applied Economists (1992) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Golany B, Kaplan EH, Marmur A, Rothblum UG. Nature plays with dice—Terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 192(1):198–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T. Incentives in teams. Econometrica (1973) 41(4):617–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T, Loeb M. Incentives in a divisionalized firm. Management Sci. (1979) 25(3):221–230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T, Radner R. Allocation of resources in a team. J. Econom. Theory (1972) 4(3):415–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD. Optimal resource allocation in an engineering design team with asymmetric information. (2003) . Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD. Incentive compatible resource allocation in concurrent design. Engrg. Optim. (2006) 38(2):209–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD, Bier VM, Azaiez MN. Game theory models of intelligent actors in reliability analysis: An overview of the state of the art. Game Theoretic Risk Analysis of Security Threats (2009) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K. Probabilistic risk analysis and game theory. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(1):17–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major JA. Advanced techniques for modeling terrorism risk. J. Risk Finance (2002) 4(1):15–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mann DP, Wissink JP. Money-back contracts with double moral hazard. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(2):285–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murshed SM. Explaining Civil War: A Rational Choice Approach (2010) (Edward Elgar Press, Northamton, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pita J, Jain M, Marecki J, Ordóñez F, Portway C, Tambe M, Western C, Paruchuri P, Kraus S. Deployed ARMOR protection: The application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. Proc. 7th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems: Indust. Track (2008) (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC) 125–132Google Scholar
  • Rasmusen E. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (2007) (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sandler T. Collective action and transnational terrorism. World Econom. (2003) 26(6):779–802CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandler T, Scott JL. Terrorist success in hostage-taking incidents: An empirical study. J. Conflict Resolution (1987) 31(1):35–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandler T, Tschirhart JT, Cauley J. A theoretical analysis of transnational terrorism. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1983) 77(1):36–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skaperdas S. Contest success functions. Econom. Theory (1996) 7(2):283–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J. Impacts of subsidized security on stability and total social costs of equilibrium solutions in an N-player game with errors. Engrg. Economist (2010) 55(2):131–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J, Bier VM. Balancing terrorism and natural disasters—Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(5):976–991LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J, Bier VM, Alagoz O. Modeling secrecy and deception in a multiple-period attacker-defender signaling game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 203(2):409–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.