From the Editors—Games and Decisions in Reliability and Risk

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0245

References

  • Abbas AE. A Kullback-Leibler view of linear and log-linear opinion pools. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):25–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakır NO. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett AM. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharjya D, Deleris LA. From reliability block diagrams to fault tree circuits. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):128–137LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharjya D, Shachter RD. Formulating asymmetric decision problems as decision circuits. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):138–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boutilier C. The influence of influence diagrams on artificial intelligence. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):229–231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buede DM. Influence diagrams: A practitioner's perspective. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):235–237LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caswell DJ, Howard RA, Paté-Cornell ME. Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's nuclear weapons program. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):30–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusoglu H, Raghunathan S. Configuration of detection software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):131–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheung M, Zhuang J. Regulation games between government and competing companies: Oil spills and other disasters. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):156–164LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb BR. Influence diagrams with continuous decision variables and non-Gaussian uncertainties. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):136–155LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb BR, Basuchoudhary A. A decision analysis approach to solving the signaling game. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):239–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delquié P. The value of information and intensity of preference. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):129–139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delquié P. Risk measures from risk-reducing experiments. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):96–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denuit M, Eeckhoudt L. Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk-(in)dependent utilities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):302–312LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Detwarasiti A, Shachter RD. Influence diagrams for team decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):207–228LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing PL, Tarantino W, Parnell GS. Use of decision analysis in the army Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):33–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feng T, Keller LR. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foschi R, Spizzichino F. Interactions between ageing and risk properties in the analysis of burn-in problems. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):103–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • French S. Expert judgment, meta-analysis, and participatory risk analysis. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):119–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • French S, Rios Insua D, Ruggeri F. e-participation and decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory RS, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haphuriwat N, Bier VM, Willis HH. Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):88–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horvitz E. From the guest editor: Special issue on graph-based representations. Decision Anal. (2005a) 2(3):125–126LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horvitz E. From the guest editor: New contributions and reflections on graph-based representations for decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2005b) 2(4):183–184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard RA, Matheson JE. Influence diagrams. Decision Anal. (2005a) 2(3):127–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard RA, Matheson JE. Influence diagram retrospective. Decision Anal. (2005b) 2(3):144–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer DL, Kirkwood CW, Corner JL. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Soyer R, Ruggeri F, Merrick JRW. Call for papers: Special issue of Decision Analysis on games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(1):82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Abbas A, Bickel JE, Bier VM, Budescu DV, Butler JC, Delquié P, et al. From the editors: Probability scoring rules, ambiguity, multiattribute terrorist utility, and sensitivity analysis. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(4):251–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klimack W, Kloeber JM. Multiobjective value analysis of army basic training. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):50–58LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lejeune MA. Game theoretical approach for reliable enhanced indexation. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):146–155LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Shenoy PP. A framework for solving hybrid influence diagrams containing deterministic conditional distributions. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(1):55–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF. Embedded Nash bargaining: Risk aversion and impatience. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(1):31–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Matheson D, Matheson JE. Describing and valuing interventions that observe or control decision situations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(3):165–181LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McLay L, Rothschild C, Guikema S. Robust adversarial risk analysis: A level-k approach. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):41–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW. Getting the right mix of experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):43–52LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW. Bayesian simulation and decision analysis: An expository survey. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):222–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, McLay LA. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Singh A. Analysis of correlated expert judgments from extended pairwise comparisons. Decision Anal. (2005a) 2(1):17–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, Parnell GS, Barnett J, Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005b) 2(1):44–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell ME. Games, risks, and analytics: Several illustrative cases involving national security and management situations. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):186–203LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell ME, Dillon RL. The respective roles of risk and decision analyses in decision support. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):220–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pauker SG, Wong JB. The influence of influence diagrams in medicine. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):238–244LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J. Influence diagrams—Historical and personal perspectives. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):232–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Predd JB, Osherson DN, Kulkarni SR, Poor HV. Aggregating probabilistic forecasts from incoherent and abstaining experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):177–189LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rios J, Rios Insua D. Supporting negotiations over influence diagrams. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):153–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sevillano JC, Rios Insua D, Rios J. Adversarial risk analysis: The Somali pirates case. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):86–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JQ, Dodd L. Regulating autonomous agents facing conflicting objectives: A command and control example. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):165–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sri Bhashyam S, Montibeller G. Modeling state-dependent priorities of malicious agents. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):172–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D, O'Sullivan TM. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang C, Bier VM. Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multiattribute terrorist utility. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):286–302LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.