Multiplicative Utilities for Health and Consumption

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0248

References

  • Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau M, Rutström EE. Multiattribute utility theory, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion. (2011) . Working paper, CEAR, Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  • Asenso-Boadi F, Peters TJ, Coast J. Exploring differences in empirical time preference rates for health: An application of meta-regression. Health Econom. (2008) 17(2):235–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attema AE, Brouwer WB. On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO. Quality Life Res. (2010) 19(4):489–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE. Double-exponential utility functions. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11(2):351–361LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. Health Econom. (2002) 11(5):447–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H, Gafni A. Time preference, the discounted utility model and health. J. Health Econom. (1996) 15(1):49–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H, Quiggin J. Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: When is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? J. Health Econom. (1999) 18(6):681–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bommier A. Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: Risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2006) 47(4):1223–1246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corner LJ, Kirkwood CW. Decision analysis applications in the operations research literature, 1970–1989. Oper. Res. (1991) 39(2):206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis WP, Chatfield JA. Concerning product integrals and exponentials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1970) 25(4):743–747CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doctor JN, Miyamoto JM. Deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from constant proportional time tradeoff and risk posture conditions. J. Math. Psych. (2003) 47(5–6):557–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domeij D, Johannesson M. Consumption and health. B.E. J. Macroeconomics (2006) 6(1):1–30Google Scholar
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005) 3rd ed.(Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK. Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):810–822LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Keeney RL. Generalized utility independence and some implications. Oper. Res. (1975) 23(5):928–940LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen G. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1644–1655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard RA. On fates comparable to death. Management Sci. (1984) 30(4):407–422LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kotlikoff LJ. Health expenditures and precautionary savings. What Determines Savings? (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) . Chap. 6Google Scholar
  • Lichtendahl KC, Bodily SE. Preferences for consumption streams: Scale invariance, correlation aversion, and delay aversion under mortality risk. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(4):985–997LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtendahl KC, Chao RO, Bodily SE. Habit formation from correlation aversion. Oper. Res. (2012) 60(3):625–637LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martin AJ, Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Lumley T. A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores. Internat. J. Tech. Assessment Health Care (2000) 16(1):137–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer RF, Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Preferences over time. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 473–514Google Scholar
  • Miyamoto JM, Wakker P, Bleichrodt H, Peters HJM. The zero condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):839–849LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Palumbo MG. Uncertain medical expenses and precautionary savings near the end of the life cycle. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(2):395–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richard SF. Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Sci. (1975) 22(1):12–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rozen K. Foundations of intrinsic habit formation. Econometrica (2010) 78(4):1341–1373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sackett DL, Torrance GW. The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J. Chronic Diseases (1978) 31(11):697–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saha A. Expo-power utility: A “flexible” form for absolute and relative risk aversion. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1993) 75(4):905–913CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JE, Keeney RL. Your money or your life: A prescriptive model for health, safety, and consumption decisions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1309–1325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JW, Habbema JD, De Haes JC. The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: Feasibility and proportional trade-off. J. Clinical Epidemiology (1995) 48(10):1207–1214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Wakker P. Cardinal coordinate independence for expected utility. J. Math. Psych. (1984) 28(1):110–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.