From the Editors—Copulas, Group Preferences, Multilevel Defenders, Sharing Rewards, and Communicating Analytics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0250

References

  • Abbas AE, Budescu DV, Yu H-T, Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ale B, Bellamy L, Cooper J, Ababei D, Kurowicka D, Morales O, Spouge J. Analysis of the crash of TK 1951 using CATS. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2010) 95(5):469–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ale B, Bellamy L, Roelen A, Cooke R, Goossens L, Hale A, Kurowicka D, Smith E. Towards a causal model for air transport safety—An ongoing research project. Safety Sci. (2006) 44(8):657–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ale B, Bellamy L, van der Boom R, Cooke RM, Goossens LH, Hale AR, et al. Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2009) 94(9):1433–1441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. Social Choice and Individual Values (1951) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baillon A. Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(2):76–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakır NO. A decision tree model for evaluating countermeasures to secure cargo at United States southwestern ports of entry. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):230–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bana e Costa CA, Lourenço JC, Chagas MP, Bana e Costa JC. Development of reusable bid evaluation models for the Portuguese Electric Transmission Company. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):22–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett AM. Cost effectiveness of on-site chlorine generation for chlorine truck attack prevention. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):366–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF. Using Bayes' rule to update an event's probabilities based on the outcomes of partially similar events. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):117–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF, Katok E, Keller LR. Honoring Michael H. Rothkopf's legacy of rigor and relevance in auction theory: From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):1–4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brothers AJ, Mattigod SV, Strachan DM, Beeman GH, Kearns PK, Papa A, Monti C. Resource-limited multiattribute value analysis of alternatives for immobilizing radioactive liquid process waste stored in Saluggia, Italy. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):98–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown RV. Working with policy makers on their choices: A decision analyst reminisces. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):14–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cantor SB. Clinical applications in the decision analysis literature (Comment on Keefer et al. 2004). Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):23–25LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho A, Larson K. A truth serum for sharing rewards. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2011) (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC) 635–642Google Scholar
  • Carvalho A, Larson K. Sharing rewards among strangers based on peer evaluations. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):253–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caswell DJ, Howard RA, Paté-Cornell ME. Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's nuclear weapons program. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):30–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusoglu H, Raghunathan S. Configuration of detection software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):131–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb BR, Basuchoudhary A. A decision analysis approach to solving the signaling game. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):239–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dias LC, Sarabando P. A note on a group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):231–237LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing B, Baker E. Development of a green building decision support tool: A collaborative process. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):172–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing PL, Tarantino W, Parnell GS. Use of decision analysis in the Army base realignment and closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):33–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feng T, Keller LR. A multiple-objective decision analysis for terrorism protection: Potassium iodide distribution in nuclear incidents. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):76–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD. Optimal resource allocation in an engineering design team with asymmetric information. (2003) . Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD. Incentive compatible resource allocation in concurrent design. Engrg. Optim. (2006) 38(2):209–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guikema SD, Bier VM, Azaiez MN. Game theory models of intelligent actors in reliability analysis: An overview of the state of the art. Game Theoretic Risk Analysis of Security Threats (2009) (Springer, New York) 1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haphuriwat N, Bier VM, Willis HH. Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):88–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnstone DJ. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer DL, Kirkwood CW, Corner JL. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):4–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility. Management Sci. (1976) 23(2):140–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keisler JM. A framework for organizational decision analysis. (1992) . Doctoral thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Keisler JM. Value of information in portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):177–189LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keisler JM, Noonan PS. Communicating analytic results: A tutorial for decision consultants. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):274–292LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2007a) 4(1):1–2LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2007b) 4(2):47–48LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2007c) 4(3):111–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2008a) 5(1):1–4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2008b) 5(3):113–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2009a) 6(1):1–3LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2009b) 6(3):121–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. From the editor. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):235–237LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. Investment and defense strategies, heuristics, and games—From the editor. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(1):1–3LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. Multiattribute and intertemporal preferences, probability and stochastic processes: Models and assessment—From the editor. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(3):165–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. Decisions over time (exploding offers or purchase regret), in game settings (embedded Nash bargaining or adversarial games), and in influence diagrams— From the editor. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(1):1–5LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Kophazi KM. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(2):57–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Kophazi KM. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):53–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Kophazi KM. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):151–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Kophazi KM. Deterrence, multiattribute utility, and probability and Bayes' updating—From the editors. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):83–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Soyer R, Ruggeri F, Merrick JRW. Call for papers—Special issue of Decision Analysis on games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2011a) 8(1):82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Baucells M, McCardle KF, Parnell GS, Salo A. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(4):173–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Baucells M, Butler JC, Delquié P, Merrick JRW, Parnell GS, Salo A. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):173–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Baucells M, Butler JC, Delquié P, Merrick JRW, Parnell GS, Salo A. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):199–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Abbas A, Baucells M, Bier VM, Budescu D, Butler JC, Delquié P, Merrick JRW, Salo A, Wu G, et al. From the editors. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):327–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Abbas A, Bickel JE, Bier V, Budescu D, Butler JC, Delquié P, et al. Probability scoring rules, ambiguity, multiattribute terrorist utility, and sensitivity analysis—From the editors. Decision Anal. (2011b) 8(4):251–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilgour DM, Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S, van Dorp JR. Generalized diagonal band copulas with two-sided generating densities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):196–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowicka D. Conditionalization of copula-based models. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):219–230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowicka D, Cooke RM. Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence Modelling (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF. Sex, lies, and the Hillblom estate: A decision analysis. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(3):149–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle KF, Rajaram K, Tang CS. A decision analysis tool for evaluating fundraising tiers. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):4–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW. Getting the right mix of experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):43–52LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, McLay LA. Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):155–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, Ruggeri F, Soyer R, Keller LR. Games and decisions in reliability and risk—From the editors. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):81–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mild P, Salo A. Combining a multiattribute value function with an optimization model: An application to dynamic resource allocation for infrastructure maintenance. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):139–152LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noonan PS. Decision and Information Analysis (2013) (McGraw-Hill, Burr Ridge, IL) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Predd JB, Osherson DN, Kulkarni SR, Poor HV. Aggregating probabilistic forecasts from incoherent and abstaining experts. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):177–189LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf MH. Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):167–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel A, Guikema SD. Resource allocation for homeland defense: Dealing with the team effect. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):238–252LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish MJ, Seidenfeld T, Kadane JB. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sevillano JC, Rios Insua D, Rios J. Adversarial risk analysis: The Somali pirates case. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):86–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Binsbergen JH, Marx L. Exploring relations between decision analysis and game theory. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):32–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D, O'Sullivan TM. Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Anal. (2006) 3(2):63–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang G, Kulkarni SR, Poor HV, Osherson DN. Aggregating large sets of probabilistic forecasts by weighted coherent adjustment. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):128–144LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.