A Simulation-Based Approach to Decision Making with Partial Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0252

References

  • Abbas AE. Entropy methods for joint distributions in decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53(1):146–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apostolakis G, Kaplan S. Pitfalls in risk calculations. Reliability Engrg. (1981) 2(2):135–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Ghaoui LE, Nemirovski A. Robust Optimization (2009) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE, Smith JE. Optimal sequential exploration: A binary learning model. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):16–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE, Lake LW, Lehman J. Discretization, simulation, and Swanson's (inaccurate) mean. SPE Econom. Management (2011) 3(3):128–140Google Scholar
  • Bickel JE, Smith JE, Meyer JL. Modeling dependence among geologic risks in sequential exploration decisions. Reservoir Eval. Engrg. (2008) 3(4):233–251Google Scholar
  • Chessa AG, Dekker R, Van Vliet B, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JDF. Correlations in uncertainty analysis for medical decision making: An application to heart-valve replacement. Medical Decision Making (1999) 19(3):276–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen RT. Making Hard Decisions. An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1996) 2nd ed.(Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Clemen RT, Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):208–224LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke RM, Waij R. Monte Carlo sampling for generalized knowledge dependence with application to human reliability. Risk Anal. (1986) 6(3):335–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frees EW, Carriere J, Valdez EA. Annuity valuation with dependent mortality. J. Risk Insurance (1996) 63(2):229–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ireland CT, Kullback S. Contingency tables with given marginals. Biometrika (1968) 55(1):179–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaynes ET. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Rev. (1957) 106(4):620–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaynes ET. Prior probabilities. IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics (1968) 4(3):227–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jimenez L, Landgrebe D. Supervised classification in high dimensional space: Geometrical, statistical and asymptotical properties of multivariate data. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1998) 28(1):39–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jouini MN, Clemen RT. Copula models for aggregating expert opinions. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(3):444–457LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer DL, Bodily SE. Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):595–609LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korsan RJ, Oliver RM, Smith JQ. Towards better assessment and sensitivity procedures. Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis (1990) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 427–454Google Scholar
  • Lowell DG. Sensitivity to relevance in decision analysis. (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, Engineering and Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie GR. Approximately maximum entropy multivariate distributions with specified marginals and pairwise correlations. (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Decision Sciences, University of Oregon, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  • Miller AC, Oliver RM, Smith JQ. Towards better assessment and sensitivity procedures by R. J. Korsan: Discussion by Allen C. Miller. Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis (1990) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 442–443Google Scholar
  • Montiel LV. Approximations, simulation, and accuracy of multivariate discrete probability distributions in decision analysis. (2012) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE. Generating a random collection of discrete joint probability distributions subject to partial information. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. (2012) . ePub ahead of print May 22, http://www.springerlink.com/content/263823150021hl36/Google Scholar
  • Nelsen RB, Dall'Aglio G, Kotz S, Salinetti G. Copulas and association. Advances in Probability Distributions with Given Marginals (1991) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 51–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelsen RB. An Introduction to Copulas (2005) 2nd ed.(Springer, Portland, OR) Google Scholar
  • Nešlehová J. On rank correlation measures for non-continuous random variables. J. Multivariate Anal. (2007) 98(3):544–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearson ES, Tukey JW. Approximate means and standard deviations based on distances between percentage points of frequency curves. Biometrika (1965) 52(3/4):553–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. (1986) . Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly T. Sensitivity analysis for dependent variables. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(3):551–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sklar A. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris (1959) 8:229–231Google Scholar
  • Smith JE. Moment methods for decision analysis. Management Sci. (1993) 39(3):340–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith RL. Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Oper. Res. (1984) 32(6):1296–1308LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith RL, Ryan PB, Evans JS. The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk. Risk Anal. (1992) 12(4):467–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang T, Dyer JS. A copulas-based approach to modeling dependence in decision trees. Oper. Res. (2012) 60(1):225–242LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler RL. Research directions in decision making under uncertainty. Decision Sci. (1982) 13(4):517–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.